First of all, welcome to the Shipbucket!
It's nice that You're trying, but I'm afraid that I can't really say anything genuinely positive about Your work.
1) Is it supposed to be
Pe-2 or it's just a loose idea about "how would Pe-2 look if it look more like VI-100 and less than it actually looked like"? Because if it's supposed to be Pe-2, then it should be captioned "Soviet Union, Petlyakov Pe-2". Also the credits should be (Kilomuse & Filthy-Prankd) - made with more-or-less same font (which shouldn't be bold, and generally You ought to take care about anti-aliasing).
2) SB/FD drawings should have shading - parts that are oriented upwards should have lighter shade (becuse the light falls on them), while those oriented downwards should have darker shade.
3) As far as I know, both Soviet and Finnish Pe-2's didn't had camouflaged bottom parts of the wings (and fuselage etc. etc.).
http://wp.scn.ru/en/ww2/b/265/1/0
http://wp.scn.ru/en/ww2/b/265/78/0
4) And last but not least - although Pe-2 was a direct descendant of VI-100, trying to use the drawing of VI-100 to make Pe-2 is practically pointless, as the only major part that could be perhaps useful to retain from such drawing would be rear part of the fuselage - after sufficient adaptation (that is, without having aft crew compartment simply erased, leaving a huge dent in the upper fuselage
). In reality, the vertical stabilzers, wings, engine nacelles, cockpit and nose were all different in Pe-2.
It just so happens, that I'm working on Pe-2 right now and I believe that more correct representation would be more like this:
(and no, You're not supposed to use it at this point - not before it's "formally" posted on template and so on)