Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
Dmitri97
Post subject: Long Beach SequelsPosted: July 4th, 2014, 3:11 am
Offline
Posts: 86
Joined: June 10th, 2014, 7:22 pm
So I was wondering why the US navy never built any sister ships to the long beach class? Was it because the radar was kind of awkward in practice? Or what? Would love to know.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rodondo
Post subject: Re: Long Beach SequelsPosted: July 4th, 2014, 3:13 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2493
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 5:10 am
Location: NE Tasmania
From my basic understanding the Long Beach was more of a proof of concept ship, showing how a nuclear cruiser may work

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)

There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
shippy2013
Post subject: Re: Long Beach SequelsPosted: July 4th, 2014, 5:59 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 658
Joined: March 26th, 2013, 7:44 pm
Location: Nottingham. United Kingdom
the uss long beach was as rodondo said a proof of concept her super structure was designed around the huge flat panel array radar system the radar that eventualy led to SPY 1 although this older system combined two radars was very advanced for its time, probably to advanced as it pushed the vacuum tube and cathode tube technology to its limits and its reliability and high maintenance meant only two ships Long Beach and Enterprise were ever fitted, power consumption was also its Achilles heal not till the advent of Aegis did the phased array come into age.......
Also of note she was also the last US ship built on a conventional cruiser hull, the subsiquent Virginia and Ticondaroga classes built on upscaled frigate or destroyer hulls. she was also the first US ship to be built with a primary missile armament if not at the request of president Kenedy woud have not had the 2 5.25 in guns as instead this space amid ships was intended for Polaris missiles, but the plan was later dropped.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Long Beach SequelsPosted: July 5th, 2014, 12:30 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Dmitri97 wrote:
So I was wondering why the US navy never built any sister ships to the long beach class? Was it because the radar was kind of awkward in practice? Or what? Would love to know.
Cost.

A lot of new surface ship and missile conversion programs died to bring the Polaris Subs into service. Note that even the original number was supposed to be "45 for Freedom", not the 41 that were built.

Edit: Just to put this into perspective, the US at the time was spending close to 10% of the GDP on defense, and we still couldn't afford everything the Navy was asking for.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Long Beach SequelsPosted: July 5th, 2014, 2:24 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
The Soviets were using 30% on its military. That was still nowhere as much money as the US budget.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Long Beach SequelsPosted: July 5th, 2014, 2:43 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Karle94 wrote:
The Soviets were using 30% on its military. That was still nowhere as much money as the US budget.
In the late 1950s the US represented nearly a quarter of the worlds economic product, or about four times that of the Soviets.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 6 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]