Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
Navybrat85
Post subject: shading questionPosted: May 19th, 2012, 8:10 am
Offline
Posts: 489
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
Contact: Website
I've seen a few newer ship drawings of late where facets angled towards the centerline, facing forward are colored either very pale gray or white...is this a new standard? I checked the style thread and didn't see anything about it.

_________________
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: shading questionPosted: May 19th, 2012, 8:23 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Navybrat85 wrote:
I've seen a few newer ship drawings of late where facets angled towards the centerline, facing forward are colored either very pale gray or white...is this a new standard? I checked the style thread and didn't see anything about it.

This is what I call advance 1. stage coloring. but the SB-rule still rules.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Navybrat85
Post subject: Re: shading questionPosted: May 19th, 2012, 8:25 am
Offline
Posts: 489
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
Contact: Website
So not neccisary but it looks cool?

_________________
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re:Posted: May 19th, 2012, 8:56 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
Basically, yes. It is very handy to show the shape of the structure. It is somewhat derived from the rounded shade of the funnels

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: shading questionPosted: May 19th, 2012, 10:33 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Only the rules of the shading is more down to the idea of what is "forbidden", that is to use gradient stepped multi-shade coloring, or use only one single color for entire drawing.
The biggest issues in the orginal style set by MConrads and other veterans was that it was logically quite inconsistent what it came to the angles of the structures. It was only mainly by the greyfunnel fraction in their RN ships that begun to set the parameters how the shading should be used in regarding those structures, so basicly our RN battleships and Carriers from 30's period serves as best "guideline" of how to do it

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Navybrat85
Post subject: Re: shading questionPosted: May 19th, 2012, 1:14 pm
Offline
Posts: 489
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:47 am
Location: In the study, with the Candlestick
Contact: Website
Thank you sirs for the clarification

_________________
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: shading questionPosted: May 19th, 2012, 7:25 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
I only shade the rear surface of a structure if it's rounded, and I try to shade it according to the angle of roundness being presented.

Again, some inconsistencies as I don't shade masts, but again that's only an area of a few pixels in width.

Best to use your judgment... I shade using the original style. We seem to have abandoned enforcement of the style rules so you're literally free to do whatever you want.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ]  Return to “General Discussion”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]