Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 64 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Go to page « 162 63 64 65 6690 »
Author Message
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 14th, 2012, 2:54 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
There is no way you're going to fit an automatic three inch gun into those shields. They're smaller than the contemporary 57mm guns.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 14th, 2012, 2:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
erik_t wrote:
I'm confused as to what 3" auto you think you're using. They look like mangled 40mm mounts to me.
I looked for the 3" Timothy has mentioned before and made them after some project drawings I googled.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 14th, 2012, 3:03 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
You could just stop by the USN parts sheets and grab the completed turret...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 14th, 2012, 3:05 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
erik_t wrote:
There's no need for the elevated helicopter platform you've drawn - all of the postwar USN BB's operated helicopters right from the stern.
Thanks, corrected.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 14th, 2012, 3:09 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Still with the impossible 3 inchers

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: USS Oregon BB-72Posted: February 14th, 2012, 3:27 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Now with 3inchers from the partsheet. Don't look like the drawing I had but ok. Does anybody know, how deep the mag goes? Maybe I have to delete the two on the stern position.
edit: by seeing it again I'm not satisfied with the position of the 3" on the mid superstructure. The firing arc is not optimal.
[ img ]

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
DER386
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 15th, 2012, 1:17 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 41
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:36 am
The 3" guns were deck mounts - no below deck penetration
They generally had 2 ammunition lockers at the rear of the deck gun shield. (which you don't show, except in the aftermost mounts)
After they were used ammo had to be passed up from the lower deck magazines


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 15th, 2012, 2:50 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
I like this Oregon. I am satisfied that you did remove some of the amidships deadweight too. However, on closer scrutiny, I'd elect to remove wholly the two amidships 3" turrets, and instead use that area for ships' boats. You may even, with advantage cut off that protruding deck structure that goes forward from the aft funnel to enable the boats to be comfortably situated. Also the 3" just above the outermost shaft I'd remove. It just doesn't have a very good command, and I know the USN, if it were built like that, within months would've removed it. Otherwise I like the graceful lines - and this time you did get them spot-on! This would've been a ship that I'd be very proud to hoist my command pendant aboard, if I were an American admiral!

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 15th, 2012, 2:52 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Btw, would you, please change the helipad configuration on the USS Louisiana to what Erik_T suggested so that I can save it to my archive? Though those 6" guns were not very reliable, I kinda like it the way you devised it!

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Kriegsmarine 1946, second approachPosted: February 15th, 2012, 3:36 am
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Very nice work!

-Matt

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 64 of 90  [ 900 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 162 63 64 65 6690 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]