Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
AEGIS, SAMSON, NTU, EMPAR + S1850..... and those are only the long range AA systems. mid range AA systems and self defence AA systems are way more numerous.... but you should adjust missiles and weapons to the system you are going to use
also, note that APAR does not work very well without SMART-L.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
would work.
notice that S1850 and SAMPSON are an great pair together, much better then SAMPSON alone.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
US Ticonderoga Cruisers carry 2 61 cell blocks (for a total of 122), so i might say 176 cells for a destroyer is a bit too much, the US Arleigh Burke DD carry about 90 of them.
_________________ My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
watch your stability!
also, look at other ships for weapon numbers
burke has 64 + 32 cells
daring has 64? cells
tico has 64 + 64 cells
KDX-3 has 32+ 64 + 32 cells (IIRC)
I would suggest going to maximum burke amount of VLS, so 96 cells, for this ship
also, try to adress powerplant and hull issues first.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
hull:
- you have an USN style underwater hull on an british style bow and an stern that looks round to me, which I cannot think of any modern ship having it.
- the stability is counted in in the hull issues, so the VLS that high might become an problem....
- as I said, the entire hull feels very kitbashy, having picked from at least 3 ships already.
powerplant: your gas turbines are very far ahead, while the diesels are very close to your prop axis. this means that your ship should be diesel + gas-electric driven, because such long shafts running through your ship is an bad idea.....
ships which have it like that, like the spruance, have 2 enginerooms which are basically the same forward and aft, with only one prop shaft going to each engine room. I doubt that is the case here though, and I doubt it workable too.
and most of that was described shortly above already.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin