Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 7 of 9  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page « 15 6 7 8 9 »
Author Message
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Reworking North PointPosted: March 13th, 2013, 7:00 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
I know the Army uses M82A4 LAWs and Carl Gustavs but not sure on anything else... probably the Stinger MANPADS too. Maybe the Javelin but not sure (it's a little too high speed...)

I know I will end up reworking the FAC fleet - and will probably just go with a force of Saar 4 and Saar 4.5 for now.

As for OPVs, I'm sure there's something available but don't know yet. I have a custom designed ship (Challenger class corvette) that I might end up using, but it's fairly modern (I believe introduced around 2005-2006). Before that? Not sure what would have been in service.

Re: LAVs for the Army - good point, at first I had a Marine Corps that operated the amphib vehicles, but shelved that quite a while ago and the amphib role was never properly brought into the Army. I imagine they use AAV-7s (or maybe LVT-5) for amphib landings though. I've never liked the wheeled armored vehicles so probably would not go with LAV-25s.

I've always liked the UH-1Y and can easily see that being chosen as the replacement for the Alouette IIIs - but the problem is that I have already chosen to go over to the SH-2G (which is a manly helicopter let's face it). As far as I can tell it offers what a shipboard helicopter needs to do (ASW, anti-surface (at times), over the horizon targeting, etc).

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Fox
Post subject: Re: Reworking North PointPosted: March 13th, 2013, 7:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 133
Joined: March 7th, 2013, 10:39 am
Quote:
Re: LAVs for the Army - good point, at first I had a Marine Corps that operated the amphib vehicles, but shelved that quite a while ago and the amphib role was never properly brought into the Army. I imagine they use AAV-7s (or maybe LVT-5) for amphib landings though. I've never liked the wheeled armored vehicles so probably would not go with LAV-25s.
If you do not like wheeled amphib vehc's?
why not go for the amphib and tracked, BMP2 ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMP-2


( I did not fully read everything, so I do now know if you want Russian vehicles or not)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Reworking North PointPosted: March 13th, 2013, 7:48 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
I don't have a problem with Russian vehicles but they do not fit the "nature" of North Point unfortunately. I use almost solely Western equipment.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Fox
Post subject: Re: Reworking North PointPosted: March 13th, 2013, 8:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 133
Joined: March 7th, 2013, 10:39 am
Figured as much,

as far as Amphibious, Russia/soviet union did way more on this topic then western countries - same holds for airborne vehicles.

now amphibious, you'll have a bit more to choose from when going wheeled.

the American LAV-25

the French VAB

Polish variant of the Patria - Hipopotam

Czech - Pandur II is supposed to be amphibious

Switerlands - Mowag Piranha

Canadian - Bison - based of Piranaha

there will most likely be more, but I cant think of more currently.

as far as tracked goes the only one I can currently think of is the AAVP

if needed I will supply links


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Reworking North PointPosted: March 13th, 2013, 8:57 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Again, have stated that I will not use wheeled vehicles in that role. ;)

I will stick with AAV-7s and possibly LVT-5s for now.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Reworking North PointPosted: March 13th, 2013, 9:15 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Fox wrote:
Polish variant of the Patria - Hipopotam
Hipo is our own design. I think you mistake it with Rosomak ;)

[ img ]

You can use some Cadillac Gage Commando family for scouting and protection duty Colo, I think they fit well NP nature.

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Fox
Post subject: Re: Reworking North PointPosted: March 13th, 2013, 9:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 133
Joined: March 7th, 2013, 10:39 am
My apoligies Rhade, wikipedia screwed up again!

also I understood it as disliked, but would consider :-p
anyway, I hope you can find your dream vehicle!

on topic of AT have you considered the Panzerfaust 3?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Reworking North PointPosted: March 13th, 2013, 9:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Considered the PzF3 but decided would just go with LAW, Carl Gustav, and eventually Javelin.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Trojan
Post subject: Re: Reworking North PointPosted: March 14th, 2013, 2:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House
I must have missed the Gustavs and laws my bad
The Challenger class looks like a good corvette but from my knowledge I am not sure if it really fits OPV needs. I think it would be a nice compliment to a class of dedicated OPVs that traded some of the challenger's speed and fire power for endurance and crew comfort for long patrols. Also I meant replacing the aloutte with the uh-1y for utility and transport roles
Also I would recommend at least having some Mine protected vehicles or some type of special forces vehicles maybe.

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Reworking North PointPosted: March 14th, 2013, 3:46 am
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Quote:
The Challenger class looks like a good corvette but from my knowledge I am not sure if it really fits OPV needs. I think it would be a nice compliment to a class of dedicated OPVs that traded some of the challenger's speed and fire power for endurance and crew comfort for long patrols.
Agreed - I will most likely choose some dedicated OPV to complement it.
Quote:
Also I meant replacing the aloutte with the uh-1y for utility and transport roles
The Alouettes will be in service until 2015 - then they can ostensibly be replaced by UH-1Ys.
Quote:
Also I would recommend at least having some Mine protected vehicles or some type of special forces vehicles maybe.
North Point is not an aggressor nation and as such doesn't need mine protected vehicles to protect troops performing counter-insurgency operations. As for special forces vehicles I would assume they use the Land Rovers and Unimogs. I know the British army used modified Land Rovers for special ops stuff in Desert Storm, and the Rhodesians did the same with Unimogs. Even though I really can't imagine a situation where this kind of capability would be required. North Point's military is entirely a self-defense force.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 7 of 9  [ 90 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 15 6 7 8 9 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]