Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 7 of 8  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page « 14 5 6 7 8 »
Author Message
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Dupuy de Lome A759Posted: December 13th, 2011, 11:52 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
svefrial, thats a little thread hijacking. Create you own topic. ;)

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
svefrial
Post subject: Re: Dupuy de Lome A759Posted: December 13th, 2011, 12:52 pm
Offline
Posts: 8
Joined: August 12th, 2010, 12:09 pm
hijacking ?? boarded the thread??

like

[ img ]

???????

You misunderstand my intention.
This ship has a separate thread in the first forum.

It will be shown here only for comparison.
The comment on the underwater part was intended to stop the perfectionists.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Dupuy de Lome A759Posted: December 13th, 2011, 1:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
svefrial wrote:
You misunderstand my intention.
This ship has a separate thread in the first forum.

It will be shown here only for comparison.
The comment on the underwater part was intended to stop the perfectionists.
Maybe I misunderstand your intention. You show ship who only conection to Dupuy de Lome is that they are both SIGINT/ELINT class support ships. It was like "hey I also draw a ship, look!" and thats look like thread hijacking. No offense. ;)

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Lazer_one
Post subject: Re: Dupuy de Lome A759Posted: December 13th, 2011, 1:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1453
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:58 am
Location: Milan - Italy
Contact: Website
svefrial wrote:
hijacking ?? boarded the thread??

like

[ img ]

???????

You misunderstand my intention.
This ship has a separate thread in the first forum.

It will be shown here only for comparison.
The comment on the underwater part was intended to stop the perfectionists.

Please respect the other members... Thanks

_________________
Lazer_One
[ img ]

Lazer_One's Worlist - Updated 2021

Documentation is always welcome here

Lazer_One's Blog


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
svefrial
Post subject: Re: Dupuy de Lome A759Posted: December 13th, 2011, 1:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 8
Joined: August 12th, 2010, 12:09 pm
:o :shock: :(

What brings you to the conclusion that I do not do this.

Rhade guessed that I am planning a change of topic. I have this put right.
I have tried to make it a little humorous.

Rhade: I think it is well understood and hopefully not hurt it.

Moreover, it is not subject of this thread.

I thought we were talking about the A759 completed by Zephyr?

I had expected that with the introduction of the A52 would someone say something about the differences. Maybe someone has indeed another example.

Allerta (E), Orion (S), Yunus (Tr), Moma (PL), Kustaanmiekka (Fin)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Dupuy de Lome A759Posted: December 13th, 2011, 2:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Well this thread is only about Dupuy de Lome, don't change it. We can create other topic for discussion about elint class support ships.

Btw: NATO: Moma ORP "Kopernik" was a hydrographic survey ship. ;)

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Dupuy de Lome A759Posted: December 31st, 2011, 8:49 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
Finalized and ready for the archives, should it be deemed worthy of inclusion.

[ img ]

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Dupuy de Lome A759Posted: December 31st, 2011, 8:54 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Are you sure the cut-outs are painted grey and not white like the rest of the ship?

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Dupuy de Lome A759Posted: December 31st, 2011, 9:05 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
I believe they are white. But they are also heavily shadowed in every pic I've seen of that ship, which is why I chose to use grey.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Dupuy de Lome A759Posted: December 31st, 2011, 9:12 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Use white then. Right now you're showing it as if it's painted grey in there.
Also, you're still using a darker shade on the superstructure, it's supposed to be the other way around.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 7 of 8  [ 73 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 14 5 6 7 8 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]