Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 31 of 123  [ 1226 posts ]  Go to page « 129 30 31 32 33123 »
Author Message
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 1:20 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
GLACIESFIRE, they look good, but I'd like a few days to check your Boeing drawings. if they are good, I'll integrate them into the SbAAP.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
GLACIESFIRE
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 9:14 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 663
Joined: November 1st, 2010, 2:17 pm
Location: Back in Italy...
Ok!!! ;-) I tired to respect the Boeing original draws more closer as possible ( found them in my university, I have done Aerospace Engeneering only for one year )

;-)

_________________
Welcome to my Kingdom!!!
( http://shipbucket.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=8293 )


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Pegasus
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 9:26 am
Offline
Posts: 37
Joined: May 22nd, 2011, 4:09 am
TimothyC wrote:
GLACIESFIRE, they look good, but I'd like a few days to check your Boeing drawings. if they are good, I'll integrate them into the SbAAP.
I'm going to be using those Boeings quite heavily so anything to make them as accurate as possible would be appreciated.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Pegasus
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: May 23rd, 2011, 9:54 pm
Offline
Posts: 37
Joined: May 22nd, 2011, 4:09 am
Out of curiosity, has anyone done SB-scale ATRs?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: May 24th, 2011, 1:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
SbAAP updates!

The following Boeings that have been posted are out of scale:
727-100 (target length - 266 pixels)
737-400 (target length - 239 pixels)
737-600 (target length - 205 pixels)
737-700 (target length - 221 pixels)
747SP (target length - 367 pixels)
757-300 (target length - 357 pixels)
777-300 (target length - 485 pixels)
787-3 (target length - 372 pixels)
787-8 (target length - 372 pixels)

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Wikipedia & Universe
Post subject: Re: PlanebucketPosted: May 24th, 2011, 5:47 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 309
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:19 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact: Website
On the smaller side, who'd try their hand at this little drone, The Arcturus T-20? Apparently it can also fire a small missile known as the MBDA Saber.
[ img ]
[ img ]

_________________
Fasismi? Ei! Natsismin? Ei! Kommunismi? Ei! Elostelu!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: May 24th, 2011, 10:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Wikipedia & Universe wrote:
On the smaller side, who'd try their hand at this little drone, The Arcturus T-20? Apparently it can also fire a small missile known as the MBDA Saber.
[ img ]
[ img ]
This is nothing new, we've already had planes like this (and smaller) made out of fiberglass (which is a composite material)

The only thing "new" about this is that it can carry an offensive weapon system, and even this isn't really that new as so much as overdue.

Also, quit posting non-art posts in the sticky thread.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Wikipedia & Universe
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: May 25th, 2011, 1:46 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 309
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:19 am
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact: Website
klagldsf wrote:
Wikipedia & Universe wrote:
On the smaller side, who'd try their hand at this little drone, The Arcturus T-20? Apparently it can also fire a small missile known as the MBDA Saber.
[ img ]
[ img ]
This is nothing new, we've already had planes like this (and smaller) made out of fiberglass (which is a composite material)

The only thing "new" about this is that it can carry an offensive weapon system, and even this isn't really that new as so much as overdue.

Also, quit posting non-art posts in the sticky thread.
Sorry, I'll keep them in the discussion area. I never meant to imply that it was new, I just linked to the first place I heard about it.

_________________
Fasismi? Ei! Natsismin? Ei! Kommunismi? Ei! Elostelu!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: May 25th, 2011, 3:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Things are worse than I thought:

Boeing Analysis

Most of these are out of scale (only the 707s, 747-1/2/3/400, 757-200, 767s, and 777-200 being in scale), with the worse offenders being the 737-3/4/700, and the 747SP with all four of them being more than 10% out of scale.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion ThreadPosted: May 25th, 2011, 7:59 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
GLACIESFIRE,thank you very much about the template with Boeing Planes!
And a question:I saw a new version of C-27s and C-130s with very dark color.Why this color?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 31 of 123  [ 1226 posts ]  Return to “Parts Sheets Discussion” | Go to page « 129 30 31 32 33123 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]