2. Bestsellers of the 1930s: N-, O- and P-classes
2.1. N-Class
The LNT of 1930 in this AU awarded Thiaria 25% of the strength of the USN in every category. As the USN was allowed 150.000 tons of commissioned destroyers (they always had more, but many were mothballed most of the time), Thiaria was allowed 37.500 tons. Given Thiaria's geographical location, the maximum allowable size of 1.500 tons was just about the bare-bones minimum to create a ship with adequate sturdiness, stability, seakeeping and range. As the Thiarians sincerely planned to get rid of all older destroyers in favour of new construction, their tonnage allotment allowed for the construction of 25 new destroyers. Design work started even before the LNT was signed; the goal was the creation of a type that could operate in the South Atlantic under any weather conditions for prolonged time periods. Seakeeping, range and accommodation thus enjoyed top priority. The British proved at the same time that a destroyer meeting these requirements could be built even well below the 1.500-ton limit - the first A-class units commissioned just as the London Naval Conference was underway - but as the Thiarians were expecting these very ships to be their primary adversaries, it would not be enough to simply copy them. The Thiarians wanted a clear qualitative edge, which required either more or heavier guns. Since the Thiarians emphasized long-range engagements (easier to break off and flee if the inevitably numerically superior enemy got the upper hand) and a very satisfactory 130mm gun was already available, four of these were included in the package, together with eight 559mm torpedoes which outranged their British counterparts as well (their grave reliability issues were not yet known at that time). Although the French had managed to put four 130mm guns on a 1.350 ts hull (Bourrasque-class), these boats had neither the range nor the seakeeping the Thiarians considered essential. Actually, it became clear early during the design process that 1.500 tons would not be quite enough; Thiarian hull construction capabilities just were not on par with those of the USN, which put ten 533mm TTs and five 127mm DP guns on the 1.500-ton hulls of the Farragut class without jeopardizing stability. Since the Thiarians were of the opinion that treaty limits were only rough guidelines, they decided to cheat, just as they did with their contemporary cruiser designs. The final draft exceeded the treaty limit by 10%, but on 1.650ts, a balanced and effective design was achieved. The destroyers had twin-shaft 40.000 hp turbines (domestically designed, based on a Curtis license) with four domestically designed boilers. The design speed of 35 kts was achieved, but not significantly exceeded (trial figures were between 35,4 and 35,9 kts at standard displacement). Best sea speed was 31,5 kts, enough to operate with any contemporary Thiarian battleship or battlecruiser. Range came as a disappointment; at 4.500 nm at 15 knots, they were slightly shorter-legged than their British A-class adversaries despite their larger size. On the other hand, with their pronounced clipper bow and long forecastle they were excellent sea boats and unusually good gun platforms. Externally, they much resembled the Insect-class torpedo boats scaled up, but the four 130mm guns were arranged in single superfiring LA mounts for the first time in Thiarian destroyer building; on a 1650-ts-hull, stability was not significantly impaired. The guns were the same as on the M-class; the problem of crew fatigue while handling the heavy shells was handled by adding two more crewmen per gun, a measure not possible on the much smaller French ships. Nevertheless, practical sustained ROF was about 9 rpm, while RN destroyers usually could sustain 12 rpm. In terms of shell weight per minute, the Thiarian ships thus were only marginally ahead of their British adversaries' performance, and in short-range engagements, the smaller British ships had an even chance of getting the better of them; the larger Patagonian destroyers with their five 120mm guns repeatedly proved clearly superior. In terms of AA armament, the Thiarian destroyers were ahead of their time, mounting four semi-automatic 37mm guns in twin mounts side by side on the aft deckhouse; four 13mm AAMGs were provided for close range work. Eight 559mm TT in two newly-designed quad sets made up the torpedo armament; no reserve torpedoes were carried. The destroyers were fitted with hydrophones and a DC rack from the beginning. Four were laid down in 1931 and four in 1932; they were named Neahmthruailthe (Immaculate), Neartmhar (Powerful), Neamhfhaiteach (Undeterred), Neamhthuirseach (Untiring), Neamhbhuan (Inconstant), Nosmhar (Dignified), Neamheaglach (Fearless) and Neamhumhal (Rebellious). Two were commissioned in 1933, five in 1934 and one in 1935.
In the years before the war, the N-class aroused much interest; although the Thiarians did not market their destroyers very vigorously (exports might reveal their oversize and result in diplomatic trouble), the Argentine, Mexican and Turkish governments showed interest. In Turkey, the Thiarians were outbid (read: out-bribed) by the Italians, and US diplomatic pressure prevented a Mexican deal, but the Argentines, who already had purchased four British- and four Spanish-built destroyers of the British Admiralty-Leader type, could be trusted not to publicize the unfair size advantage of the new Thiarian destroyers. A contract over 4 ships was struck in 1933 after some Argentine admirals had visited the class ship Neamhthruailthe during acceptance trials, and two copies each were laid down in 1934 and 1935. As the Argentines had standardized the Vickers 120mm gun for their destroyer force, the Thiarian ships were to be delivered without guns. Five 120mm pieces, which were acquired from the La Carraca ordnance works in Spain, were mounted (the fifth gun on the aft deckhouse in Q position, displacing the 37mm cannon; the Argentine ships were limited to four 13mm AAMGs for air defence). The torpedoes were also acquired in Spain; each ship was given two triple 533mm TT sets. This armament variation resulted in somewhat reduced topweight, making the Argentine N-class slightly faster than their Thiarian counterparts and even better sea boats, and much better in-fighters into the bargain, in exchange for their completely lacking AA capability. They were named Buenos Aires, Corrientes, Entre Rios and Missiones. All four were delivered in 1938.
The Thiarian vessels meanwhile were retrofitted with ASDIC, HF/DF antennae and four more AAMGs by 1939. They formed the 2nd Destroyer Flotilla of the Thiarian fleet when the war started and acquitted themselves well; all eight emerged from the bitter battles with the RN and the Patagonians in the opening phase of the war without losses.
Over the next two years, these destroyers received the usual upgrades: the AAMGs were replaced with six single 20mm cannon, the DC outfit was doubled and a complete radar suite was installed. This process started early in 1941 and was not completed till late 1942. By that time, the class still had not taken any losses despite near constant involvement in heavy combat.
Neamhthuirseach then was lost in May 1943 in a surface action against the RN, and Neamhumhal went down late that year in an airstrike off the Brazilian coast. Of the other six, Nosmhar and Neamhbhuan remained unchanged for the rest of the war. The other four - Neartmhar, Neamhthruailthe, Neamhfhaiteach and Neamheaglach - were further upgraded between late 1943 and early 1944 as they became available for R&R. They lost both masts and received an all-new tripod mast forward; aft only a small signal mast was installed. The radar suite was replaced with the latest generation of centimeter-wave radars, and the semi-automatic 37mm cannon gave way for four fully automatic ones in single navalized army mounts. For these, a radar-guided centralized fire control system was installed. The number of 20mm cannon remained at 6, although they were rearranged, and even more DCs came on board. This modernization reached the limits of the growth potential of these destroyers; by mid-1944, the refitted units were only good for 32 kts and their formerly excellent stability reserve had been completely used up, resulting in a rather lively behaviour in heavy seas. But the luck of the class was unimpaired; all six survived the war, and none of their crews mutinied.
After the armistice, these ships were retained as training vessels for some time, but after the final peace treaty, they were quickly discarded. They had seen hard use and were worn out, and by 1950, they were all scrapped.
The four Argentine ships actively participated in the Axis war effort - in one memorable pitched four versus four battle in the River Plate estuary in 1941, they sank two Patagonian destroyers without losses - but their modernizations were much more austere. The Thiarians did not declassify their radar technology for export before mid-1942, when they started shipping their newest sets to Koko by submarine; at that time, the Argentines received full suites of Thiarian first generation radars. They also received a total of eight 20mm cannon, ASDIC and more DCs; the refit was completed by late 1943 on all ships.
Unlike the older Argentine Destroyers, which mostly stayed with the Argentine battleships, frequently came under air attack and took severe losses, the Buenos-Aires-class accompanied the Argentine heavy cruisers which usually were assigned to raiding task forces. They seemed to share the luck of the Thiarian N-class and emerged from the war in full strength. As Argentina was the only Axis country that had been dragged into the war by an aggression of an Allied nation, they got off easy when the peace was signed, and all four Buenos Aires-class ships remained with the Argentine Navy. They had a long postwar career and were not deleted before the early 1970s.
2.2. O-class
The N-class had been the result of a long and thorough design process and was considered most satisfactory. Not surprisingly, the destroyers of the 1933 and 1934 were externally identical to this successful class. The only visible differences were the absence of a mainmast, which was replaced with a short signals mast, and the addition of two more twin 13mm AAMGs amidships. What qualified these ships as a new class was hidden deep in their bellies: Although their turbines were the same as before, their boilers were of a novel type with significantly increased steam pressure and temperature. This resulted in more compact size for the same power, allowing larger bunkers, and better fuel efficiency, giving these vessels 1.500 nm more range than their predecessors and placing them on par with contemporary US vessels. As the Thiarians had raised steam pressure and temperature much more moderately than the Germans (500 versus 1.000 psi pressure and 350 versus 460 °C working temperature), they did not face the same reliability problems that made the early German high-pressure plants virtually useless, althouth teething troubles persevered until into the war. Oigeanta (Youthful), Oilte (Skilled) and Oirirc (Illustrious) were commissioned in 1935, Olc (Wild), Ollmhor (Tremendous), Omosach (Chivalrous), Ollgairdeach (Jubilant) and Onorach (Honourable) followed in 1936. Together, they made up the 3rd Destroyer Flotilla.
The O-class went through similar improvements as the N-class: First, they received ASDIC, HF/DF-coils and more AAMGs;
then, air surveillance radars, four 20mm cannon and more depth charges were added till late 1941;
and by 1943, all units had a full radar suite and a total of eight 20mm cannon.
The only thing this class utterly lacked was what their predecessors had in abundance: Luck. By mid-1943, the class had become the only Thiarian destroyer type of both world wars to be completely wiped out. Olc was Thiaria's first destroyer loss of the war, and Omosach and Ollgairdeach also did not survive past mid-1940. Oigeanta and Oilte went down in 1941, Onorach in 1942 and the last two, Ollmhor and Oirirc, in 1943. Two of them perished in gunnery actions, where they proved inferior to interwar British and Patagonian destroyers because of their lack of ROF. Fortunately for Thiaria, this matter had already been solved in the follow-on class.
3.2. P-class
By the time the FY 1935 destroyers were being presented for approval, first service experience with the N-class had already been collected. Although the Navy was generally very content with their new destroyers, the gun crews reported difficulties with working the guns in their half-open single gunshields in heavy weather. Moreover, the 37mm HA guns had rather limited sky arcs, and their single optical director did not even cover all of them; on any bearing forward of dead athwartships, the 37mm guns were limited to local control. The Navy's design department tackled both problems by replacing the single shielded gun mounts with two fully enclosed twin single purpose gunhouses, one forward and one aft. These turrets were fitted with mechanic loading aids, enabling them to make full use of the theoretical ROF of their guns over sustained engagements. This effectively increased firepower by 25% without increasing the number of guns. Main artillery fire control arrangements remained unchanged, although the separation of rangefinder and director had been identified as obsolescent. By shortening the forward shelter deck, turret A would not need to be placed any more forward than the previous gunshield, so the design could retain its excellent seaworthiness. By providing only one gun mount fore and aft, the B and X positions were freed for the 37mm twin mounts, and a second director could be installed atop the bridge. Sky arcs of the 37mm guns were much improved, and their directors shared them without restrictions. Moving the 37mm guns allowed for the installation of two more twin 13mm AAMGs on their old positions, increasing their number to 12. Torpedo armament remained at eight tubes without reserve torpedoes. Since the total weapons and fire control package was heavier than before, the ships were made slightly beamier for compensation. Displacement increased to 1.700 tons; since the Thiarian Navy was cheating the other treaty signatories already, this further increase in size was viewed with dignified indifference. To retain the previous design speed of 35 knots, the previous round stern was replaced with a transom stern. This modification was successful; all ships exceeded 36 knots on trials, although their engines were pushed well beyond their designed hp. Preabuil (Gallant) and Piaclach (Eager) were completed in 1937, Pras (Witty), Pearlach (Radiant), Prapailte (Ready), Preabach (Vibrant), Praitinniuil (Astute) and Poncuil (Precise) in 1938. They formed the 4th Destroyer Flotilla.
Although these destroyers were the first Thiarian destroyer class to be completed with ASDIC, it took till mid-1940 until all had been retrofitted with HF/DF. When the war started, all of them quickly received four additional 13mm AAMGS forward and more depth charges. Poncuil was lost in early 1941 in this state.
By late 1942, all others had swapped their 13mm AAMGs with eight single 20mm cannon and received a full radar suite; the short mainmast was stepped as a tripod to carry the surface search radar antenna, although this arrangement was not considered very satisfactory either; it was not until the later R-class that the Thiarians achieved a really workable radar arrangement. The first unit to complete this conversion was Preabuil in November 1941, the last one was Praitinniuil in December 1942. Pras and Preabach were lost before the conversion programme was over.
In this guise, Preabuil and Prapailte served throughout the war. Pearlach was lost early in 1944 without further modifications as well. The increased air threat however prompted another refit, which was applied in late 1943 and early 1944 to Praitinniuil and Piaclach. The radar fit was thoroughly modernized, requiring installation of a tripod foremast, and the four old 37mm AA guns were replaced with six single fully automatic ones, mounted two abreast fore and aft on platforms widened over nearly the full width of the deck (the arcs of the main guns were restricted, but in 1944, this was considered a very secondary problem) and alongside the mainmast. The 20mm had to be reduced to six for lack of deck space.
The four surviving units had seen strenuous service and were scrapped in the late 1940s after the war was over. Interestingly, three of the four joined the Mutiny against the Murchada regime, whilst most crews of the older destroyers stayed loyal to the Fascists.
By the time the Thiarians were building the P-class, the whole world had entered an ever more frenzied rearmament mode. This also spread to South America. Chile had ordered six large destroyers based on the F-/G-class leaders in Great Britain in 1935 to counter the Argentine acquisition of Thiarian N-class vessels, which in turn prompted the Peruvians to look for a replacement for some of their quickly ageing Russian-built destroyers. They chose the Thiarian P-class over an American-built Farragut-derivative (France and Italy were eliminated from the bidding process early), citing superior seakeeping, stability and accommodation of the Thiarian ships as the decisive factor (as usual in South America, bribery was probably an even more decisive factor). Four units were ordered in 1936 and delivered in 1939. Unlike the Argentines, the Peruvians also obtained the complete armament in Thiaria; the ships were completely identical with the Thiarian P-class. They were named for battles involving the Peruvian Navy: Iquique, Islay, Malpelo and Chipana.
As Peru managed to stay neutral in the second world war, none of these ships was modernized during this period; they served until well into the 1970s, Islay and Malpelo even till 1982.
The final South American customer for Thiarian destroyers was the Venezuelan Navy. Their destroyer force had been acquired in 1919 from the estate of the defunct Imperial Mexican Navy and consisted of six Austrian-designed 950-tonners, closely patterned on Austria's own Tatra-class, and six smaller units, which had long been relegated to secondary duties. Four of the improved Tatras had been thoroughly rebuilt and were still usable, but to replace the entire rest of their torpedo craft, the Venezuelans ordered four Thiarian P-class ships in 1937, which were laid down in 1938. They differed from all other P-class ships by their bow shape; the Thiarians had introduced bulbous bows for their destroyers with the R-class of 1937 and adapted the Venezuelan P-class to this novelty. The bulb increased top speed by about half a knot, but in practice the difference was not discernible. The bow also improved flotation forward, but on the downside it was - particularly on this class, less so on the larger R-Class and its derivatives - a source of vibration. The Venezualen vessels had tripod foremasts from the start. More importantly, they replaced the old-fashioned fire-control system that separated director and rangefinder with an integrated director. The destroyers would have been named for Venezuelan generals and statesmen: Presidente Castro, Generalissimo Miranda, Marescal Sucre and Presidente Gomez; if delivered, they would have been painted in 'Caribbean Blue' and poison green lower hulls, like the ships of the former Imperial Mexican Navy, whose colour scheme was adopted by the Venezuelans and not changed before the 1950s.
None of the four was delivered when Thiaria entered the Second World War, and they were requisitioned forthwith. They were renamed Saoradh (Liberating), Seiftiuil (Resourceful), Scoipiuil (Confident) and Seasmhach (Steadfast); although they were P-hulls, they received S-names, reportedly because the Thiarians had run out of suitable P-names. They were completed with HF/DF, ASDIC, air surveillance radars and one K-gun on each side, but still without stern DC racks or radar fire control and assigned to the 3rd and 5th destroyer flotillas to replace losses. Seiftiuil was lost in 1941 in this state, only a few weeks after commissioning.
The other three received a complete radar suite and six 20mm cannon instead of their AAMGs by mid-1942. Saoradh and Scoipiuil were the only units of her class to accompany the Thiarian fleet on the famous Panama raid; they remained off Peru with the replenishment ships while the rest of the task force went on the final leg of their mission.
In early 1943, the two Panama Raid participants were further upgraded by the addition of two twin 20mm mounts aft; the former singles were moved to the bridge wings, increasing the total number of 20mm to 12. Now they finally received stern racks for DCs. Scoipiuil was lost in this state in 1944 in a surface action against the Rechercheans, days before the Armistice.
Seasmhach as the only unit of the class had her electronics suite totally refurbished in early 1944. She also had her 37mm cannon replaced by four fully automatic singles, mounted two abreast fore and aft. She and Saoradh survived the war. As Venezuela had joined the Allies in 1943, the destroyers were demanded by and conceded to the Venezuelan Navy under peace treaty conditions. They were thoroughly modernized in the late 1950s and remained in service till the mid-1970s.
Greetings
GD