Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 16 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Go to page « 114 15 16 17 1846 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: March 12th, 2011, 7:27 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
acelanceloet wrote:
not so many types!! we gave options, not that you should put them all on it!
it is possible, but logistics are going hell!
the russians have only 3 types at the same time, the US 5 or 6.... that's including transport, helicopters etc....
also, many of your aircraft have overlapping missions.

I would suggest:
one light helicopter (for example lynx)
one heavy helicopter (for example merlin)
one multirole aircraft (or, if you really want, an fighter type + an bomber type or an fighter type + an multirole type)
one transport aircraft (of which versions can do the AWACS role)

that's it!
:D


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: March 12th, 2011, 7:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
80's-90's
The joker is for special operations!

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: March 12th, 2011, 7:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
why harriers?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: March 12th, 2011, 8:06 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
acelanceloet wrote:
why harriers?
Thought it is okay with a little VTOL capacity on board. or!?! :?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: March 12th, 2011, 8:08 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
it is possible. but you don't need them, because your ship is large enough for fixed wing assets, which are faster, more capable, and easier to maintain in general.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: March 12th, 2011, 8:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
heuhen wrote:
acelanceloet wrote:
why harriers?
Thought it is okay with a little VTOL capacity on board. or!?! :?
Does your Airforce use Harriers? Are they deployed on the baby carriers you posted before? The point is that putting STOVL craft on a full CATOBAR carrier without some justification for them being there (ie they are used elsewhere, and occasionally based off of the full carrier), is a waste of money.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: March 12th, 2011, 9:04 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
TimothyC wrote:
heuhen wrote:
acelanceloet wrote:
why harriers?
Thought it is okay with a little VTOL capacity on board. or!?! :?
Does your Airforce use Harriers? Are they deployed on the baby carriers you posted before? The point is that putting STOVL craft on a full CATOBAR carrier without some justification for them being there (ie they are used elsewhere, and occasionally based off of the full carrier), is a waste of money.
they are deployed on the baby carrier. When the baby carrier is deployed with the super carrier, the super carrier are carrying some extra for the baby carrier! I think...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: March 12th, 2011, 10:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
I play a little with the idea. where the:

The Scandinavian three kingdoms are together as a union but is also independent countries. And can have a Scandinavian military together. + that each of the Scandinavian has its own small military on the side of (local security).

Finland and Iceland may have come in at a later date.

http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h37 ... ingdom.png

The Navy:

1. fleet (The Frigate force)
Motto "The cleaning party"
"The toilet"

7 Frigate (Bergen class and Bravo class)
2 corvetts (D-type)
3 submarine
5 fast attack craft

2. fleet (Task force one)
Motto "Alpha force, GO!"
"We have the largest sewage tank!"

1 Super carrier (Odin class)
2 Hevy cruiser (Battle class)
1 cruiser (Norway class)
4 Destroyers
7 Frigates
4 Submarines
2 Tankers
2 (Othe Auxiliary ship)

3. fleet (Task force two)
Motto "We are Hevy!"

1 Super Carrier (Odin class)
1 Baby carrier (Admiral John Ulstrup)
1 LHD (General von krogh)
6 Hevy cruiser (Battle class and King class)
10 Destroyers
12 Frigates
6+4 Submarines
3 Tankers
3 (Othe Auxiliary ship)

9 Fleet (The Royal Norwegian fleet)
Motto: "We are NORWAY!"
"VIKING'S, ATTACK!"
"Hello! is there anyone here ...!"

2 Light carrier (Vtol and Helicopters)
6-(1 Lost in battle) cruisers (Norway class)
5 Destroyers
5 High speed and light weight Destroyers
6 Frigates
15 Submarine (10 * 50 meters submarine, 4 * 75 meters submarine and 1 * 100 meters submarine)
6 Tankers
25 coastal corvetts (skjold class and CXXX045 3 (not yet drawn in SB-AU) )


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: March 12th, 2011, 11:10 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
High speed Destroyer
Suggestions.
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: Design forum for "AU" Northern KingdomPosted: March 12th, 2011, 11:27 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Ditch the rear gun, heighten the mast and funnel change the bow profile (looks kinda wet atm)

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 16 of 46  [ 457 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 114 15 16 17 1846 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]