Thanks guys for the replies - it is fascinating to me what can and can't work (from a practical perspective) when you get down to the nitty gritty.
The better use of the hulls would be hard to justify even with the hindsight advantage, but if I was putting out that kind of money and scarce human engineering capital , I would have done the Lexington, Saratoga, thing on those six obsolete hulls.
Even a slow carrier is better than no carrier. And the engineering time and the industrial effort expended is no worse, even if it is as complex. (maybe more complex, if the over engineered Aquila is an example).
My understanding from a
thread I had on the Alternate History website was that the short length and slow speed of the Deutschlands made them unsuitable as carrier conversions. Is this correct, or could something be worked out?
PS: a challenge would be awesome, although I am not sure that I am at a level ready to take part though.
PPS: Krakatoa, where in NZ are you? I'm in Auckland.