Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 10  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 510 »
Author Message
radagast477
Post subject: Re: Canadian Common Hull combatant ConceptPosted: November 9th, 2010, 4:31 pm
Offline
Posts: 64
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:49 am
Location: Duluth, MN
Is that OTO 76mm planned for the Province? Also, is that APAR similar to what is planned on the Province?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
prairie canuck
Post subject: Re: Canadian Common Hull combatant ConceptPosted: November 14th, 2010, 8:33 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 54
Joined: October 18th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Thanks to all for the suggestions and corrections. I've made a lot of changes and think it's getting better.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Canadian Common Hull combatant ConceptPosted: November 14th, 2010, 2:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
No on the SM-3s. You don't have a large enough radar to provide guidance for them (why do people pull the boosters off of them for drawings anyway?). The same is roughly true for your SM-2ERs. The only use I see for such large SAMs and ABMs is if the ship receives launch instructions from another, more capable craft (such as those with APAR* or AEGIS).

Also If I assume that you are using Mk-41 VLS cells, you can quad-pack those ESSMs giving you 96 in the foreward VLS array. At that point you can cut that down by half, and carry 48 ESSM, 24 Nulka, and 24 RAM.

*What is the combat system that APAR uses anyway?

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Canadian Common Hull combatant ConceptPosted: November 14th, 2010, 3:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
why have you removed the apar and smart-l?
for the top view: the I mast has the same instruments on the front and back.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: Canadian Common Hull combatant ConceptPosted: November 14th, 2010, 4:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
deleted


Last edited by Colombamike on March 30th, 2011, 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Canadian Common Hull combatant ConceptPosted: November 14th, 2010, 4:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
also, use the new oto 76 I posted today. and colombimike: the real frigate plans speak over the use of APAR and SMART-L, so that wouldn't be such an bad choice at all.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Canadian Common Hull combatant ConceptPosted: November 14th, 2010, 6:38 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Mike - there is no such thing as "Mini-AEGIS". AEGIS, as I am sure you are well aware, is the name for the suite of systems that are deployed. I think you are simply referring to the smaller SPY-1F arrays that integrate with the rest of the AEGIS Combat System.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: Canadian Common Hull combatant ConceptPosted: November 14th, 2010, 7:11 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
TimothyC wrote:
Mike - there is no such thing as "Mini-AEGIS". AEGIS, as I am sure you are well aware, is the name for the suite of systems that are deployed. I think you are simply referring to the smaller SPY-1F arrays that integrate with the rest of the AEGIS Combat System.
Yep :mrgreen:
Thanks for remember this ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
prairie canuck
Post subject: Re: Canadian Common Hull combatant ConceptPosted: November 15th, 2010, 1:08 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 54
Joined: October 18th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
APAR and Smart-L are back, also some SAM reconfiguring. The wider hull was an attempt to accommodate sea-keeping in the North Atlantic.
Attachment:
IROQUOIS NEW BUILD 5.GIF


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Canadian Common Hull combatant ConceptPosted: November 15th, 2010, 1:46 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
I fail to see why you would have dedicated Cells for SM-3s and Tomahawks when you already have a Mk-41 VLS array forward.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 10  [ 94 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 510 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]