Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Today's tec, Tomorows tec...Posted: February 8th, 2012, 7:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Liters her in Norway to.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Today's tec, Tomorows tec...Posted: February 8th, 2012, 9:18 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Carthaginian wrote:
15% more than a regular tanker...
seems like just one more reason to raise the cost of a gallon of gas to me.
Construction cost has next to nothing to do with the final price. Moving the oil via ship accounts for less than 3% of the total cost of the final product.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carthaginian
Post subject: Re: Today's tec, Tomorows tec...Posted: February 9th, 2012, 5:54 am
Offline
Posts: 587
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 7:25 pm
Location: Daphne, Alabama, C.S.A.
bezobrazov wrote:
Ok guys, remember when comparing gas prices, you're moving in totally different universes. Here, in the US we use the Gallon as a measurement, so I pay about $3.35 for regular unleaded. But a gallon is approximately 4.6 liters, so measured that way, we still have a relatively speaking cheap gas (though most Americans would most vehemently disagree!) But then I'm originally from Sweden, where the last gas price I noticed was SEK 14/L. Did I mention that I drive a gas guzzler, an Infiniti?
I drive a REAL gas-guzzler... a 1/2 ton Chevrolet pickup that gets 19-20 m.p.g. Of course, I need something like that considering all my 'recreational activities' (pulling a boat, hauling firewood, pulp wood, hay, father's tractor, etc) so I say it's worth it.

And gas here is relatively cheap- but it's still too expensive all things considered. ;) I remember being able to buy 10 gallons of gas, a six pack and a can of Cope for $20 and getting change back.

Thiel wrote:
Carthaginian wrote:
15% more than a regular tanker...
seems like just one more reason to raise the cost of a gallon of gas to me.
Construction cost has next to nothing to do with the final price. Moving the oil via ship accounts for less than 3% of the total cost of the final product.
That's still a dime a gallon for me ATM- which is (to this stingy Reb) a lot after I fill up the 20+ gallon tank on my truck, which gets 20 miles to a gallon.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Today's tec, Tomorows tec...Posted: February 9th, 2012, 4:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Oh today the price for fuel has gone up to 15,- NOK or more than 57.- NOK, approx 9.7 USD!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Today's tec, Tomorows tec...Posted: February 18th, 2012, 2:59 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
technology is wonderful!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-aE5oszXyQ


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Ashley
Post subject: Re: Today's tec, Tomorows tec...Posted: February 19th, 2012, 10:14 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 582
Joined: August 17th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Gone to hell
Wow, what a gyro, not one ball rolls by ship rolling.

_________________
This is a serious forum. Do not laugh. Do not post nonsens. Do not be kiddish. At least, not all the time.
Current work list:
go on playing dead


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 2  [ 16 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page « 1 2

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]