Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 2  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2
Author Message
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Design Study 381 & 382Posted: January 8th, 2011, 10:04 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
What's that little thing just aft of the stern windlass?
It looks a little like some kind of paravane installation, but that can't be right.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Design Study 381 & 382Posted: January 8th, 2011, 10:20 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Interesting variation on the Type 42 . One very small thing; the Wasp looks wrong; I think its taken from the deck landed version and still has some of the railing attached.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Design Study 381 & 382Posted: January 8th, 2011, 12:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Thiel wrote:
What's that little thing just aft of the stern windlass?
It looks a little like some kind of paravane installation, but that can't be right.
Type 182 torpedo decoy crane.
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
Interesting variation on the Type 42 . One very small thing; the Wasp looks wrong; I think its taken from the deck landed version and still has some of the railing attached.
Might have used some wrong Wasp. :oops:

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Design Study 381 & 382Posted: January 8th, 2011, 2:43 pm
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Nice work Novice.

One small point, that Sea Dart laucnher is not only hideous but wrong. The smaller launcher I've drawn for our AU is the correct Sea Dart launcher used aboard the Type 42. I think Bristol had a different type of launcher, it shares the same top part but with a different, taller base. Some re-work is needed on the launcher. Friedman has some good views of Bristol's launcher.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: Design Study 381 & 382Posted: January 8th, 2011, 5:32 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
No real major air search set on the Sea Dart variant? That seems implausible.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Design Study 381 & 382Posted: January 8th, 2011, 8:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Hood wrote:
Nice work Novice.

One small point, that Sea Dart laucnher is not only hideous but wrong. The smaller launcher I've drawn for our AU is the correct Sea Dart launcher used aboard the Type 42. I think Bristol had a different type of launcher, it shares the same top part but with a different, taller base. Some re-work is needed on the launcher. Friedman has some good views of Bristol's launcher.
THX Hood for the correction. It will be updated soon.
erik_t wrote:
No real major air search set on the Sea Dart variant? That seems implausible.
That is how she was designed, the long air search was to be done by carrier borne aircraft, and/or the carrier itself. These ships were meant to be part of a carrier escort group, and so they did not even have ASW weapons, the ASW element was done by the Type 17 destroyers. At that time the RN was placing a good deal of faith in TIDE (a fleet data-link), all ships sharing their targets and enabling the best ship placed to engage any given target to do so.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Design Study 381 & 382Posted: January 8th, 2011, 9:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Mods done to the Type 42. If you cann't see it refresh the page using ctrl+F5

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 2  [ 17 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]