looking nice now. I would move the catapult a bit to the side so you can use half of that bow surface for parking space if needed, and I still think you should shorten the hangar a bit at the front end (or lessen the width over there a bit) and the general stores etc in the bow will not be able to be there, the fore peak bulkhead will be the first bulkhead aft of the bow thrusters
I still think she is a bit fat for her length and depth, but now within acceptable levels on first glance (not on my own pc now, so I cannot check my refs)
note also that the way the reactors are refueled on the CDG is not the best way, but an pretty roundabout way born about the use of basically submarine reactors (compact but heavy) and the requirement, due to the shorter ship, to not open up the flight deck. as far as I know, on USN carriers, the decks are opened up, but I have no hard evidence of this and might be wrong. check the size of the fuel elements of your chosen reactors, if these are longer then your hangar deck height (or very close to that) you will still be unable to use the CDG method, which might or might not be an problem as you only need to build in additional strength at this point and make sure no unmovable pipes and equipment is on top of it. that was what I was refering to earlier btw, not the need to put an elevator on top
may I suggest drawing an waterline top view as well? it might give some clear views on the ships arrangement as well.
all in all, getting to look really good, and I have less and less to comment on it