Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 12 of 16  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page « 110 11 12 13 1416 »
Author Message
Charybdis
Post subject: Re: Weird Sisters ReduxPosted: July 23rd, 2013, 9:13 pm
Offline
Posts: 1003
Joined: November 8th, 2011, 4:29 am
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Contact: Website
Wonderful drawings of a great ship. I wonder why the flight deck stopped so far short of the bow.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: Weird Sisters ReduxPosted: July 24th, 2013, 1:17 am
Offline
Posts: 3910
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
A couple other carriers had similar traits initially, but they were corrected in subsequent refits. Guess that's what made Furious unique.

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Weird Sisters ReduxPosted: July 28th, 2013, 10:39 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
rifleman wrote:
didn't realise how narrow the flight decks were
I think this scan illustrates it well. Being built on battle cruiser hulls limited the width somewhat.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Weird Sisters ReduxPosted: July 28th, 2013, 11:07 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
That's nice pic, that black space on both sides of elevator... what they are ?

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Weird Sisters ReduxPosted: July 28th, 2013, 11:09 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
They be funnels Rhade. ;)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Weird Sisters ReduxPosted: July 28th, 2013, 11:13 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Funnels ? ... from engine room ? :shock:

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Weird Sisters ReduxPosted: July 28th, 2013, 11:19 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
Yeah if you look at the drawings on the port and starboard side there are grills at the stern that where used when flying was taking place.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Weird Sisters ReduxPosted: July 28th, 2013, 12:50 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Hmm... I notice grills at the stern but I was thinking that those on deck was from hangar ventilation or something.

Well, everyday something new. Thx Bombhead. ;)

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BrentD15
Post subject: Re: Weird Sisters ReduxPosted: July 28th, 2013, 1:07 pm
Offline
Posts: 81
Joined: June 4th, 2013, 9:28 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Bombhead wrote:
rifleman wrote:
didn't realise how narrow the flight decks were
I think this scan illustrates it well. Being built on battle cruiser hulls limited the width somewhat.
I wonder if the Akagi had such restrictions in flight-deck width, being built from a battlecruiser hull.

_________________
R.I.P. Admiral Furashita.
May you sail to glory forever. *salutes*


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Spike
Post subject: Re: Weird Sisters ReduxPosted: July 28th, 2013, 7:01 pm
Offline
Posts: 28
Joined: January 24th, 2012, 7:13 am
Quote:
I wonder why the flight deck stopped so far short of the bow.
Its due to design differences. In the USN, the use of arresting gear allowed a higher aircraft recovery rate. An aircraft would land, the barrrier would be lowered and the aircraft would taxi forward to either be lowered on the elevator or be pushed toward the bow. Aircraft had to be pushed toward the bow because they could be recovered faster than the elevator could cycle. This method allowed the practical use of a large airgroup.

The RN did not use arresting gear early on. They let the landing aircraft roll to a stop on the flight deck. The raised forward section of the flight deck of these ships was due to the need to have a ramp or incline that would help bring an aircraft to a halt, if necessary. After the aircraft stopped, it was taken to the elevator and struck below. Only then was the next aircraft allowed to land. Needless to say, this required a considerable amount of time. It also made the use of large airgroups impractical.

Due to the long recovery times, the RN had a need to launch fighters and recover strike aircraft at the same time. That's why their early carriers have the lower launching ramp/deck. The need to provide sufficient clearance for the launching fighter on the lower deck required that the upper flight deck stop early in the fighters take-off run. Also, the fine lines of the battlecruiser bow wouldn't allow the flight deck to run all the way to the bow (probably about as far as the bow 4-inch mount in the 1943 drawing) without causing considerable trimming by the bow.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 12 of 16  [ 156 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 110 11 12 13 1416 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]