Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 8  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 58 »
Author Message
WWII44
Post subject: Re: Alliance Nations and the Iperian EmpirePosted: July 9th, 2013, 6:22 pm
Offline
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm
Some of My ships with cage masts


The ANS Avenger as compleated in 1924
[ img ]

The ANS Castel Conwy cira 1918
[ img ]

The ANS Merrimack circa 1921
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KHT
Post subject: Re: Alliance Nations and the Iperian EmpirePosted: July 9th, 2013, 7:27 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
Beautiful! Even though I personaly don't trust lattice masts, and up until recently didn't like them much appearance-wise either, I've come to like them more, and they fit very well on these ships of yours! :D


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WWII44
Post subject: Re: Alliance Nations and the Iperian EmpirePosted: July 9th, 2013, 7:47 pm
Offline
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm
KHT wrote:
Beautiful! Even though I personaly don't trust lattice masts, and up until recently didn't like them much appearance-wise either, I've come to like them more, and they fit very well on these ships of yours! :D
Unfortnuneatly the Alliance did away with cage masts in favor of "USS Arizona style" Tripods mainly becuse the Iperian gunners would aim for the base of the cage masts to try and topple them over(making a sport of seeing who could send them crashing down to the deck the quickest). The Merrimack retained her cage masts until 1946 when she under went a major overhaul.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Alliance Nations and the Iperian EmpirePosted: July 9th, 2013, 9:14 pm
Offline
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
Your ships still exhibit certain tendency for too low decks, but generally You're doing nice job. :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Alliance Nations and the Iperian EmpirePosted: July 11th, 2013, 1:54 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
WWII44 wrote:
KHT wrote:
Beautiful! Even though I personaly don't trust lattice masts, and up until recently didn't like them much appearance-wise either, I've come to like them more, and they fit very well on these ships of yours! :D
Unfortnuneatly the Alliance did away with cage masts in favor of "USS Arizona style" Tripods mainly becuse the Iperian gunners would aim for the base of the cage masts to try and topple them over(making a sport of seeing who could send them crashing down to the deck the quickest). The Merrimack retained her cage masts until 1946 when she under went a major overhaul.
Topple cage masts? I don`t think that`s possible. The US Navy did test the lattice masts without ever bringing one down.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WWII44
Post subject: Re: Alliance Nations and the Iperian EmpirePosted: July 11th, 2013, 8:29 pm
Offline
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm
Karle94 wrote:
Topple cage masts? I don`t think that`s possible. The US Navy did test the lattice masts without ever bringing one down.
None the less the ANS avenger had her cagemasts and much of her upper works shot away during the Battle of Lembeh Strait in 1940 this prompted a rebuild with Tripod masts and the rest of the Alliance Battleships recived this rebuild and by 1942 it was a rare site to see an Alliance ship that still retained her cagemasts.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Alliance Nations and the Iperian EmpirePosted: July 11th, 2013, 8:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
actually, I think it is easier to topple an pole mast then an lattice mast. I do not know about tripods, but still :P

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WWII44
Post subject: Re: Alliance Nations and the Iperian EmpirePosted: July 11th, 2013, 9:24 pm
Offline
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm
acelanceloet wrote:
actually, I think it is easier to topple an pole mast then an lattice mast. I do not know about tripods, but still :P
Tripods are easy to topple provided you cause an explosion that destroys every thing beneath it and the ships bridge.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WWII44
Post subject: Re: Alliance Nations and the Iperian EmpirePosted: July 11th, 2013, 9:24 pm
Offline
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm
acelanceloet wrote:
actually, I think it is easier to topple an pole mast then an lattice mast. I do not know about tripods, but still :P
Tripods are easy to topple provided you cause an explosion that destroys every thing beneath it and the ships bridge.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: Alliance Nations and the Iperian EmpirePosted: July 12th, 2013, 7:19 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
The USN did extensive tests on lattice masts, and found they were nearly impossible to topple, even when subjected to heavy gunfire, but what wasn't anticipated, was the kind of damage that could be incurred due to heavy storms at sea.

I think the change was partially due to this, and partially due to stuff being stuck up there than needed more stability than what the cage mast was thought to offer.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 8  [ 80 posts ]  Return to “Alternate Universe Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 58 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]