» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 9 of 18  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page « 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 18 »
[Print view]
Author Message
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: German WW1 and WW2 carrier projectsPosted: July 7th, 2013, 2:28 am
Offline
Posts: 3907
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Sweet...the Hippers are next! Yay! :)

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KHT
Post subject: Re: German WW1 and WW2 carrier projectsPosted: July 7th, 2013, 12:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
I'm with Emperor, looking forward to the Hippers! :D
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BrentD15
Post subject: Re: German WW1 and WW2 carrier projectsPosted: July 7th, 2013, 1:55 pm
Offline
Posts: 81
Joined: June 4th, 2013, 9:28 pm
Location: Wisconsin
DG_Alpha wrote:
Exactly. Like all German warships, GZ had to pass the Kiel Canal. However, with her huge hull she posed a large area of attack for side winds and her maximum speed in the canal (9kn) wasn't enough to compensate. These Voith-Schneider propellors were there to keep her steady. They were also powerful enough to accelrate the whole carrier alone to a whopping 4kn, given there was no current, wind or any form of rough sea... (The propellors were also completely retractable).

I don't think there was ever a full carrier conversion planned for Roon, as far as I know, so there are no plans for me (at the moment). Currently, I'm trying to get the Hipper-class done.
Wow, those are pretty handy.

And about the full Roon conversion, perhaps that can be left for the AU thread. ;)

_________________
R.I.P. Admiral Furashita.
May you sail to glory forever. *salutes*
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WWII44
Post subject: Re: German WW1 and WW2 carrier projectsPosted: July 7th, 2013, 4:55 pm
Offline
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm
The Kriegsmarine would have been a force to be reckoned with if it had a couple flattops in it's arsenal.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BrentD15
Post subject: Re: German WW1 and WW2 carrier projectsPosted: July 9th, 2013, 1:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 81
Joined: June 4th, 2013, 9:28 pm
Location: Wisconsin
WWII44 wrote:
The Kriegsmarine would have been a force to be reckoned with if it had a couple flattops in it's arsenal.
Maybe, but the fact that the German military at the time was mostly land-based (Luftwaffe included), I find myself doubting the practicality of an aircraft carrier in their arsenal, unlike Japan or Great Britain, whom would find aircraft carriers more viable considering that they're more island-based than continental.

But then I might be overthinking this, so what do I know? :mrgreen:

_________________
R.I.P. Admiral Furashita.
May you sail to glory forever. *salutes*
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WWII44
Post subject: Re: German WW1 and WW2 carrier projectsPosted: July 9th, 2013, 6:35 pm
Offline
Posts: 622
Joined: August 6th, 2011, 4:10 pm
BrentD15 wrote:
Maybe, but the fact that the German military at the time was mostly land-based (Luftwaffe included), I find myself doubting the practicality of an aircraft carrier in their arsenal, unlike Japan or Great Britain, whom would find aircraft carriers more viable considering that they're more island-based than continental.

But then I might be overthinking this, so what do I know? :mrgreen:
A carrier in the Atlantic Sea lanes could spot a convoy from very far off and then dispatch attack planes to lay waste to it. It could also provide air suport for attacking wolfpacks by posibly picking off the convoys escourts.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: German WW1 and WW2 carrier projectsPosted: July 9th, 2013, 7:51 pm
Offline
Posts: 3907
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Sadly, the Germans didn't have enough ocean-going escort ships to protect carriers. Had Graf Zeppelin and Peter Strasser been completed, they would've been prime targets and more than likely easy pickings. And with them being the only two carriers available to the Germans, they would've been horded like gold. Hitler was not amused to learn of Bismarck's fate...I'm sure he'd have quite a bit more to say had one of the carriers met a submarine and lost.

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KHT
Post subject: Re: German WW1 and WW2 carrier projectsPosted: July 9th, 2013, 9:30 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
Not to mention the range of most German escort ships were... deplorable.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BrentD15
Post subject: Re: German WW1 and WW2 carrier projectsPosted: July 10th, 2013, 1:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 81
Joined: June 4th, 2013, 9:28 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Ahh, so Germany having an aircraft carrier at that time would've been impractical?

_________________
R.I.P. Admiral Furashita.
May you sail to glory forever. *salutes*
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: German WW1 and WW2 carrier projectsPosted: July 10th, 2013, 5:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Given the tactical and strategic realitets at the time, yes.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 9 of 18  [ 175 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 18 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]