HTMS Naresuan (FFG 421)

Before I leave on holiday

For correct parts (These are part-sheet that is updated every month!... or so):

The ship is carrying:

Armament:
1 × 5 in/54 (127 mm) Mk-45 Mod 2 naval artillery gun
2 x 30mm MSI-DSL DS30MR automated small calibre gun
8 cell Mk.41 vertical launch system for 32 x RIM-162 ESSM
8 x RGM-84 Harpoon SSM launcher
2 x triple 324 mm Mk-32 Mod.5 tubes

US Weapon-sheet:
http://shipbucket.com/Parts%20Sheets/US ... s%2011.png

The ship is using following radars and sensors:

Sensors and
processing systems:

Saab Sea Giraffe AMD 3D surveillance radar
Thales LW08 long range search radar
Raytheon AN/SPS-64 Navigation radar
Selex IFF SIT422CI&M425
Saab 9LV Mk.4 with Saab TIDLS combat management system
2 x Saab Ceros 200 fire control radar
Atlas DSQS-24d sonar

Electronic warfare
& decoys:

ESM ITT ES-3601 (AN/SLQ-4)
ECM Type 984-1 noise jammer&Type 981-3 deception jammer
Decoys Terma SKWS (C-Guard)

US Radar sheet: her you can find some radar here:
http://shipbucket.com/Parts%20Sheets/US ... ts%204.png

Here you can find radars like the LW-08:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/63276563/dutch ... t/v1.4.png

British Radar sheet:
http://imageshack.us/a/img442/8850/rnradarsheet.png

you are also using the wrong lifeboat/workboat, this boat's is the closest looking:
http://i1086.photobucket.com/albums/j44 ... oats-1.png

For the "Super Lynx 300" she is carrying, I don't have those helicopters. But if an member of SB have it, pleas post it.

acelanceloet wrote:

eswube, not necessary need he shade that way. many famed artists on here, like TimothyC and Colo do not use this most of the time. what should be done though, is if he uses it on one spot, he should use it on all, or on none.

So far I believed it is necessary per rules, but maybe You're right, so I'm not going to argue.
Point is, however, that this drawing has such shading "used on one spot" (namely the front "wall" of the bridge) - so it should therefore have it elsewhere as well.

I generally only shade the rear of funnels or large citadel towers (and only if it's curved). I tried "highlight" shading, but I felt as though it gave a "hexagonal" appearance that I didn't like. The lack of gradients in Shipbucket style forces this.

crazy ??

1 STIR (top of the bridge)and 1 China fire control(on the hangar) will remove and replace with 2 Ceros200 and 1 Eos500. now main mast still empty RTN will upgrade complete in next year

[ img ]

Light comes from the bow, so these sides You've made darker should be lighter.

And I think that unless these are smooth curves, they should be divided by contour.

oh! my mistake. again for today

[ img ]

while you noted you'd have an STIR forward, you don't have one on the drawing....
the STIR series can be found here: http://www.shipbucket.com/images.php?di ... ts%203.png

the same goes for the harpoon launchers. ow and, does anybody know if that lynx helicopter was ever approved for use? it doesn't look right to me.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

acelanceloet wrote:

ow and, does anybody know if that lynx helicopter was ever approved for use? it doesn't look right to me.

It was not. Also, the helicopter should be shown as landed on the flight deck (because the ship has a hanger to embark said helo).

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

Shipbucket

Who is online