Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 36 of 52  [ 518 posts ]  Go to page « 134 35 36 37 3852 »
Author Message
BB1987
Post subject: Re: USN Systems (08/22/2012)Posted: February 24th, 2013, 10:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
also (sorry for realizing it only now) i have this laying in my pc since half a year:
[ img ]
i've found them somewhere around the parts sheet section around six months ago, i don't know who made them in the first place, bt they are for sure an updated and more detailed version of the 16/50 mark 7 guns.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
paul_541
Post subject: Re: USN Systems (08/22/2012)Posted: February 26th, 2013, 9:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:58 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
It was from me, here is an updated version:
[ img ]

_________________
My motto:Per ardua ad astra (RCAF)
Current Drawings:
USS Midway CVB-41 and later alterations
HMCS Bonaventure CVL-22 and later alterations
Paul 2024


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: USN Systems (02/26/2013)Posted: February 26th, 2013, 10:11 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Thiel wrote:
Please, in the name of all you hold dear get rid of that horribly out of scale 40mm Bofors. The properly sized one can be found in the post just above yours.
Edit: And the 20mm Oerlikons as well
Updated:

[ img ]

Change Log for Version 1.8:
  • 20 and 40mm guns updated.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: USN Systems (02/26/2013)Posted: March 20th, 2013, 8:18 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
Update for the Harpoon mounts:

[ img ]

You have NO CLUE how long it took me to get the oblique view correct enough to satisfy my own standards...

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: USN Systems (02/26/2013)Posted: March 20th, 2013, 8:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
could you do the 30 degrees version as well? you don't know how long that one took to get correct with the previous version, although the sizes are correct it now looks completely different from what you have here :S

(also, I suppose these have gotten rid of the few pixels too high?)

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: USN Systems (02/26/2013)Posted: March 20th, 2013, 8:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
Sorry mate, this is as close as you're going to get to the 30 degrees version. This @#^$%#^ was murder to get an angled view to look right.

Also, YES, there's overlapping black pixels. Not doing that would make the mounting far too "heavy" for the size. This conveys something inbetween a triple line, and a double black line.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: USN Systems (02/26/2013)Posted: March 20th, 2013, 8:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
and is this drawing lower then the old one? if not, I see no need for another parts update, to be honest.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: USN Systems (02/26/2013)Posted: March 20th, 2013, 9:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
acelanceloet wrote:
and is this drawing lower then the old one? if not, I see no need for another parts update, to be honest.
Last time I posted an update to the Harpoon, NOBODY complained about it being too high, so NO, there is no reduction in height. The addition is the angled mounts, these are now in line with the side/front/back views.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: USN Systems (02/26/2013)Posted: March 29th, 2013, 7:18 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
might be useful a new version of the FAST crane?
[ img ]

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: USN Systems (02/26/2013)Posted: March 30th, 2013, 7:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Wow. Fantastic drawing of a very tricky subject.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 36 of 52  [ 518 posts ]  Return to “Official Parts Sheets” | Go to page « 134 35 36 37 3852 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]