» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 9  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 »
[Print view]
Author Message
Kilomuse
Post subject: Re: North Point FDPosted: February 28th, 2013, 8:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: August 6th, 2010, 4:07 am
Location: California
Very nice drawings, Colo. The grey Spit looks awesome.

_________________
Republic of Lisenia AU - In progress
Republic of Lisenia in FD Scale - In progress
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
indiajuliet
Post subject: Re: North Point FDPosted: February 28th, 2013, 9:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 346
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 2:15 pm
Location: London, UK
Colosseum wrote:
Yes I realize. ;) I'll fix it tonight after work.

Any comments on the actual drawings? Camouflage look alright? Any comments on roundels, tail numbers, etc?
Looking good, Colosseum. Have you tried giving the roundels a thin yellow or white edge to provide contrast so the blue part of the roundel can be more easily seen? That might look good. Was North Point with the Allies in WW2, as the roundel could easily be confused with a RAF/RAAF/RNZAF SEAC roundel, and I know your AU is usually highly neutral? If it is neutral then it may be worth thinking about a more distinctive roundel or other markings, like the Swiss. It all looks great though, and I hope to see more soon! :)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: North Point FDPosted: February 28th, 2013, 11:16 pm
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Colosseum wrote:
Yes, for the trop Spitfire and the Beaufighter (which I imagine is probably primarily a recon plane). The MkII Spitfire should be 1942 (not 45). Its camouflage was inspired by German designs, but I will probably change it to the traditional brown and green later on.
Isn't that a bit of a retrograde step? The only real reason you'd need terrestrial coloured camouflage on a fighter late war (as the Luftwaffe did) is to hide it from being persecuted from the air by marauding air power which I'm imagining you don't have to content with? If anything I'd improve upon the grey scheme maybe bluer or purpler hues to it or scrap paint and go au natural with anti glare panels!
indiajuliet wrote:
Colosseum wrote:
Yes I realize. ;) I'll fix it tonight after work.

Any comments on the actual drawings? Camouflage look alright? Any comments on roundels, tail numbers, etc?
Looking good, Colosseum. Have you tried giving the roundels a thin yellow or white edge to provide contrast so the blue part of the roundel can be more easily seen? That might look good. Was North Point with the Allies in WW2, as the roundel could easily be confused with a RAF/RAAF/RNZAF SEAC roundel, and I know your AU is usually highly neutral? If it is neutral then it may be worth thinking about a more distinctive roundel or other markings, like the Swiss. It all looks great though, and I hope to see more soon! :)
I find myself in agreement here especially on the mono colour backgrounds.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: North Point FDPosted: March 1st, 2013, 12:48 am
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
indiajuliet wrote:
Colosseum wrote:
Yes I realize. ;) I'll fix it tonight after work.

Any comments on the actual drawings? Camouflage look alright? Any comments on roundels, tail numbers, etc?
Looking good, Colosseum. Have you tried giving the roundels a thin yellow or white edge to provide contrast so the blue part of the roundel can be more easily seen? That might look good. Was North Point with the Allies in WW2, as the roundel could easily be confused with a RAF/RAAF/RNZAF SEAC roundel, and I know your AU is usually highly neutral? If it is neutral then it may be worth thinking about a more distinctive roundel or other markings, like the Swiss. It all looks great though, and I hope to see more soon! :)
North Point doesn't exist in the same universe as "RL Earth" - it's in the Statesmanship universe (see my sig). So those considerations aren't really important. ;) I will probably revise the roundel with a white border for visibility's sake but believe the RAAF SEAC used the same type of roundel and that seems to have been visible, so not sure yet.
Quote:
Isn't that a bit of a retrograde step? The only real reason you'd need terrestrial coloured camouflage on a fighter late war (as the Luftwaffe did) is to hide it from being persecuted from the air by marauding air power which I'm imagining you don't have to content with? If anything I'd improve upon the grey scheme maybe bluer or purpler hues to it or scrap paint and go au natural with anti glare panels!
That was the impression I got - hence the grey/light grey camouflage which I will probably stick with. The blues on the trop Spitfire and the Beaufighter are "ocean" camo I guess. What does a Seafire look like?

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: North Point FDPosted: March 1st, 2013, 5:30 am
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Have corrected the scale bar, date issues, and added a white ring around the roundels of the aircraft with sea camouflage:

[ img ]

[ img ]

Also, added a Beaufort of Coastal Command:

[ img ]

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
nighthunter
Post subject: Re: North Point FDPosted: March 1st, 2013, 7:08 am
Offline
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
Nice work on the Beau!

_________________
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: North Point FDPosted: March 1st, 2013, 11:10 am
Offline
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
Nice work! :)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: North Point FDPosted: March 1st, 2013, 12:03 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Hmmm... I always think that in case of Beuafighter, wings, control surfaces, retractable landing gear and aft section of the fuselage were identical to those of the Beaufort

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: North Point FDPosted: March 1st, 2013, 3:34 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
It was almost a complete redesign from what I've read - so to use the existing drawing would have been difficult!

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: North Point FDPosted: April 10th, 2013, 5:12 am
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Probably not canon, just a fun piss-take:

[ img ]

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 9  [ 84 posts ]  Return to “FD Scale Drawings” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 … 9 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 40 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]