Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
some of your goalkeepers don't fit on the positions you put them. I also wonder why you would use the Goalkeeper, which is extremely expensive, on ships the least likely to actually get attacked directly, because an Dual purpose system seems more logical to me on these vessels.
I would also like you to use the latest and final goalkeeper, the version you have is at least 2 versions down and is inaccurate. the latest version is in the belowdeck parts thread, which also has the belowdeck of the GK to show you why it won't fit on some locations you put it.
you also cut an Mk 48 in half on the LDP and I suggest using better props then these.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
it is not. the foot is different, the radar is different, and you are missing the engine which let the radar rotate. the deck penetration is more then one deck at the very least, which means you need 2 deck below it, you certainly don't have that space on the sponson of the LCC-888
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:663 Joined: November 1st, 2010, 2:17 pm
Location: Back in Italy...
There is space for 2 tubes (1 SDV per tube) with 2 configuartions, the first have 2 tubes one per side and the other have just one tube in a central position. Usually the sub carry just one tube for preserve the speed and manoeuvrability.