Then he's just going to have to go and completely redesign the ship then. It's looking like that's the most practical solution, rather than trying to jam a square peg into a round hole and insist that's the only way it can be done.
I suggest having the gun well aft, like on real life landing ships with guns this large.
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
that was what I was going to suggest too. aft you have the hull depth to have an larger magazine, you have the bouyancy to support the bigger weight and you have a lot less to do with waves. you have to watch out for the engines though, and of course the vehicle deck.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
near or on the aft superstructure. look at any heavy guns on landing ships.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
odysseus1980 wrote:
Something like the Soviet Ropucha Class?
show me what you mean with an sb drawing or pic please. I don't have time to look it up every time
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin
Posts:7510 Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
most likely still too far forward, but better. I think you should sacrifice or move part of your structure.
_________________ Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new. Shipbucket Wiki admin