Shipbucket

this 'concept' was one of the more exotic ideas of the COEA group. critics of conventional warships often said that the best way to ensure survivability would be to take an really big hull and fill it with bouyancy material. that was exactly what concept 3C3 was, an armed supertanker. the original plan was to use the massive supertanker hull for VLS and helicopter spots. the version illustrated is essentially four FMLAC superstructures build on top of an massive hull. each has a 5''/62 gun with an Mk 48 Sea Sparrow launcher alongside it. apart from electric motor drive rooms and foam, the hull is empty. Electric drive made it possible to put the gas turbines themselves in the superstructures. clearly the design shown was not altogether serious, since all four superstructure elements are identical and therefore quite redundant. however, the design does make the point that a very large hull would permit sufficient redundancy that the ship would probably survive multiple missile hits, either in the hull or in some of the superstructure elements.

an real ship based on this concept would thus have VLS in the hull. this design is not to be taken as an design, but as an starting point, from what an effective warship could be developed.

concept and information from friedman's US destroyers.

my own notes on the design are these though:
- if you have such an huge displacement and volume available, why use gas turbines? diesels could make the structure much smaller (due to putting the engines below it) and the fuel economy much better.
- very stealthy structures on that complete brick of an hull?
- the split bridges are an quite bad idea
- I would not recommend landing an helicopter next to the middle 2 structures, wind is gonna be mad out there.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Having seen the original drawing, she's not as ugly as I had expected! She's also certainly got redundancy

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

They would have saved a lot of time if they had just decided to turn this


into this:

_________________
Taxi: viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3780
Railferry:viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3928&p=83427#p83427
Valk:viewtopic.php?f=18&t=3929

One might mistaken this as something from Nation States but it is a serious design and good drawing too!

Certainly weird, but also very original. Great work!

thanks guys. I would not consider it too serious, though, nobody would ever build an ship like this in the real world, especially not with 4 identical structures.

I would love to see somebody go overboard with it though, modifying the ship to something that could have actually been build, while keeping the high redundancy and damage resistance possibilities of this design. any takers?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Sounds like another drawing challenge, I may have a go.

_________________
Worklist

"If people never did silly things nothing intelligent would ever get done." ~Ludwig Wittgenstein

I'm kind of wondering what's the point of four 5/45s and only NSSM capability, or would this have been akin to an ASW carrier?

completed the description of the file which, I belief, answers your question

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

So, where does the fuel go?
Or the crew for that matter?

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.