Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 3  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3
Author Message
Gator_Country
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 20th, 2013, 6:07 pm
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: May 21st, 2012, 9:05 pm
Location: The American South
Hmm, did the Flight II revert to the MK38 25mm as the drawing shows? The Flight 1 San Antonios have turreted 30mms, so I can't see why they'd go "backwards" (especially with ECM, but whatever).


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 20th, 2013, 6:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
For cranes: http://i1106.photobucket.com/albums/h37 ... sLarge.png


For helping you a bit around with the drawing. I did ths a bit fast so the might be some errors! But there are some fuve things that I came over:
- Hull shading a bit weird!
- double black line and some places up to 5px thick black line!

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/88748209/lpd17flightii.PNG


I could write a long list of things, but they would mainly fit my drawing style then. But a bit work and if you study drawings of San Antonio that are laying around on the web (trusted one), and studying pictures and 3D drawings of this vessel a bit closer you will find a lot of things that need to be changed.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MC Spoilt B'stard
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 21st, 2013, 3:41 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:52 pm
Location: Willemstad, Curacao
MC Spoilt B'stard wrote:
Im realy wondering, what is the purpose of this class? San Antonio is a LPD this looks more like a LSD like the Bay Class.
So she would not fit the LPD-17 San Antonio Flight II description but more like a new class based upon, Bay classes were also based upon Rotterdam/Galicia class LPD's.
You're correct, the Flight II is designed to replace the Bay Class, by using the proven hull and machinery of the San Antonio LPDs. They havn't named the class yet, so they're calling it the San Antonio Flight II.[/quote]

Replace the Bay class? A US ship replacing a british ship? i dont think so:P i think u mean the Harpers Ferry and Whidbey Island classes?:P

_________________
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gator_Country
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 21st, 2013, 11:23 pm
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: May 21st, 2012, 9:05 pm
Location: The American South
I believe he means for the export market. Although, I can't see why anyone would want to enter that field. Pretty much everybody who wants a dockship already has one, for the most part, either homebuilt, European export (which is pretty popular), or ex-USN (India, Brazil, Taiwan). The market seems pretty loaded already, to me at least.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
socar37
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 23rd, 2013, 1:23 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 16
Joined: August 25th, 2010, 8:48 am
I was under the impression the Flight II was intended to replace the Whidbey Island/Harpers Ferry LSDs.

_________________
SoCar37

"Prepared In Mind & Resources"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
socar37
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 23rd, 2013, 1:25 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 16
Joined: August 25th, 2010, 8:48 am
In fact... Here's the link to the HII website where they specifically say so.

http://www.huntingtoningalls.com/flight2/index

_________________
SoCar37

"Prepared In Mind & Resources"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MC Spoilt B'stard
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 24th, 2013, 2:49 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:52 pm
Location: Willemstad, Curacao
socar37 wrote:
I was under the impression the Flight II was intended to replace the Whidbey Island/Harpers Ferry LSDs.
Well i never even heard about the plans before this drawing was made, i only knew about the BMD variant of LPD-17, also just like the BMD variant i think a humanitarian ops only variant would be 2 ships that are a waste of (tax) money better put that money on a future cruiser programme to do the BMD and the hospital ship replacement for humanitarian ops.

_________________
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 24th, 2013, 5:38 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
A "humanitarian ops" variant would actually be a needed addition. The LPD-17 Flight II by itself is inherently a decent hospital ship platform, and would be much improved over the current Mercy and Comfort which are infact converted bulk carriers and very limited in their capabilities.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
jezza
Post subject: Re: LPD-17 San Antonio Flight IIPosted: January 26th, 2013, 5:27 am
Offline
Posts: 42
Joined: January 23rd, 2012, 12:30 pm
socar37 wrote:
I was under the impression the Flight II was intended to replace the Whidbey Island/Harpers Ferry LSDs.
That was what I meant. I'm an Aussie, so we're currently all over our new Bay Class ship and it's well deck! :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 3  [ 29 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]