Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 13 of 36  [ 353 posts ]  Go to page « 111 12 13 14 1536 »
Author Message
erik_t
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: January 5th, 2013, 9:58 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
In English, 'ton' and 'tonne' are both real units (the former of the US Customary system, the latter being a metric ton). The word 'tonn' is both incorrect and confusing; I'm not sure to which unit you are referring.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: January 5th, 2013, 10:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
and a another one!

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: January 5th, 2013, 10:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
the weights are in metric tonnes, according to the Wärtsilä website.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: January 5th, 2013, 10:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Yes ace is correct. If I write tonnes then I mean tonnes noting else. I have and will always use the correct standard and that is the metric. I'm not stupid ..... Or are I!


erik_t if I draw Wärtsilä generators, a Scandinavian company. In Scandinavia we have always used the correct system and that is the metric system. every thing else is sooooo old-fashioned!!! hahaha


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: January 5th, 2013, 10:10 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
heuhen wrote:
Yes ace is correct. If I write tonnes then I mean tonnes noting else. I have and will always use the correct standard and that is the metric. I'm not stupid ..... Or are I!


erik_t if I draw Wärtsilä generators, a Scandinavian company. In Scandinavia we have always used the correct system and that is the metric system. every thing else is sooooo old-fashioned!!! hahaha
You clearly don't know anything of Scandinavian measurement standards.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: January 5th, 2013, 10:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Thiel wrote:
heuhen wrote:
Yes ace is correct. If I write tonnes then I mean tonnes noting else. I have and will always use the correct standard and that is the metric. I'm not stupid ..... Or are I!


erik_t if I draw Wärtsilä generators, a Scandinavian company. In Scandinavia we have always used the correct system and that is the metric system. every thing else is sooooo old-fashioned!!! hahaha
You clearly don't know anything of Scandinavian measurement standards.

Oh yeeaaaah!


I have always used metric, but I know some is using imperial. and Norway had they version of imperial/metric units, Denmark and Sweden to. I did see that often before when I was building traditional boats, we had to use Danish inches instead of Norwegians, but when we made a copy of a British lifeboat we used the British units from 1600/1700, So yeah I know about them. but I have never bean comfortable with these units.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: January 5th, 2013, 10:29 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Unless I boogered myself up with scrolling, the drawing originally said 'tonn'. I don't care which measurement we use as long as it's consistent and clear. Metric tons are just peachy.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: January 5th, 2013, 10:30 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
it said tonns, yes :P he fixed it ;)
edit: but, on the point of measurements, we still learn to work with all diferent measurements because different countries use different standards. there is just no standardisation worldwide.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: January 12th, 2013, 8:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Found this on the photobucket from mitch. I thought lets share:

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
DG_Alpha
Post subject: Re: belowdeck partsPosted: January 12th, 2013, 9:42 pm
Offline
Posts: 762
Joined: January 1st, 2012, 7:01 pm
Location: Germany
These look nice! I'll place them on the German heavy guns parts sheet in the next couple of days.

_________________
My worklist
Any help and source material is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 13 of 36  [ 353 posts ]  Return to “Parts Sheets Discussion” | Go to page « 111 12 13 14 1536 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]