» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 3  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 »
[Print view]
Author Message
Chz
Post subject: Re: Deveour class heavy cruiserPosted: January 1st, 2013, 1:01 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 31
Joined: April 4th, 2012, 1:45 pm
Karle94 wrote:
3 inches is 76mm. I would say that is somewhat lacking in firepower. Wouldn`t dual purpose 127mm/5 inch guns be better?
closest thing to those would be standardized 130mm dual-purpose guns used on many other designs of mine, so I suppose the 3in AA could be replaced with those
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Deveour class heavy cruiserPosted: January 1st, 2013, 1:34 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
That would give good AA protections as well as good arnaments to bear on destoryers and crusiers. I believe that would be the optimal choice.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Deveour class heavy cruiserPosted: January 1st, 2013, 11:00 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
If it is late 40's to early 50's, I'd put some more radar on there perhaps.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Chz
Post subject: Re: Deveour class heavy cruiserPosted: January 1st, 2013, 11:05 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 31
Joined: April 4th, 2012, 1:45 pm
Zephyr wrote:
If it is late 40's to early 50's, I'd put some more radar on there perhaps.
what kind, specifically?
it already has an air and a surface search
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Deveour class heavy cruiserPosted: January 1st, 2013, 5:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
It just seems rather sparce. Maybe take a look at the late war Baltimore, Oregon City and Salem drawings. *shrug*

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Chz
Post subject: Re: Deveour class heavy cruiserPosted: January 1st, 2013, 5:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 31
Joined: April 4th, 2012, 1:45 pm
Zephyr wrote:
It just seems rather sparce. Maybe take a look at the late war Baltimore, Oregon City and Salem drawings. *shrug*
eh, I don't know what most of the radars do and are for so I'm kind of weary of putting wrong/useless radars on

[ img ]
here it is with 130mm secondaries this time and a few more 20mm peashooters
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Deveour class heavy cruiserPosted: January 1st, 2013, 6:09 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
It could do with some updated propellers... those just look a bit crude (IIRC they are from 2008).

I would also consider raising the superstructure up another deck. Right now it looks a bit too low to really "fit" with other period designs.

As for radar fits, it really depends on the year you're wanting to portray. If it's early (1940-42), put an early air search radar (CXAM, etc) on the foremast with a surface search (SG) on a small platform above the bridge. Late-war (1944-1945), place a more modern air search (SK, SK-2) on the foremast with an SG above it. Then put a backup SG radar on the mainmast.

This might help:

[ img ]

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Chz
Post subject: Re: Deveour class heavy cruiserPosted: January 1st, 2013, 6:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 31
Joined: April 4th, 2012, 1:45 pm
Colosseum wrote:
It could do with some updated propellers... those just look a bit crude (IIRC they are from 2008).
where could I find these updated propellers
Colosseum wrote:
I would also consider raising the superstructure up another deck. Right now it looks a bit too low to really "fit" with other period designs.

As for radar fits, it really depends on the year you're wanting to portray. If it's early (1940-42), put an early air search radar (CXAM, etc) on the foremast with a surface search (SG) on a small platform above the bridge. Late-war (1944-1945), place a more modern air search (SK, SK-2) on the foremast with an SG above it. Then put a backup SG radar on the mainmast.

This might help:
I'll think about the superstructure and thanks for the radar tips.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Deveour class heavy cruiserPosted: January 1st, 2013, 6:21 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
It looks to me like you've lifted the underwater hull from the old Cleveland drawing and recolored it. If that's the case, just take the newest version of the Cleveland hull and you'll get the propellers along with a much better rendition of a cruiser hull.

[ img ]

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Chz
Post subject: Re: Deveour class heavy cruiserPosted: January 1st, 2013, 6:39 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 31
Joined: April 4th, 2012, 1:45 pm
Colosseum wrote:
It looks to me like you've lifted the underwater hull from the old Cleveland drawing and recolored it. If that's the case, just take the newest version of the Cleveland hull and you'll get the propellers along with a much better rendition of a cruiser hull.
http://www.shipbucket.com/Real%20Design ... 201944.png
honestly, I kind of eyeballed the hull from the Brooklyn class, but I'll swap the propellers next time
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 3  [ 29 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]