Well, thanks for that snippy comment, Tim! I was giving you a compliment, but had my head in a figurative sense bitten off. One wonder why I persist... As for your comment on the CLG:s I'm not sure, however, what your referring to, since I've not heard any previous comment about it (as far as I can recall, that is!) Please refer to it in the proper thread then, so that I can look into it.
_________________ My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
You know I would've figured that if there were one thread in here where I'd have to use this it would be in one of APDAF's threads but given what's been going on so far this is about as useful a contribution as almost anything else starting in the second page:
Bezo, I get what you're saying about accuracy, but at this level it's just counterproductive to start introducing new railing types. This is an area where the staff will I think collectively put its foot down and say "NO". Gollevainen agrees with me as he has stated above.
Colo, I appreciate your considered and mature reply, and, like I was saying: I was just adding my five cents - a step, which I now find rather regrettable, alas. But, no worries, it shall not be repeated! And you do what you need to do with railings et al.
_________________ My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
Posts:3220 Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
I just clocked this one, and very nice drawing, but I won't be drawn into the railing issue Only one suggestion (if allowed), you might consider a darker hue of blue under the bridge overhang, to indicate shade?