Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 5 of 23  [ 225 posts ]  Go to page « 13 4 5 6 723 »
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 24th, 2012, 6:27 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
wasn't it common practise to show the actual waterline with an black line on the drawing?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 24th, 2012, 6:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
acelanceloet wrote:
wasn't it common practise to show the actual waterline with an black line on the drawing?
No. Sometimes done as artistical preference in the beginning, but not required. Especially as a waterline is not quite a hard thing.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Erusia Force
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 24th, 2012, 6:49 pm
Offline
Posts: 440
Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
Location: Virginia, USA
acelanceloet wrote:
wasn't it common practise to show the actual waterline with an black line on the drawing?
If it is decided that I should do so it will be done. I will post a version with the black line to make everyone happy. The reason I did not and instead placed blue lines is because the waterline differed depending on the amount of consumables on board and the typical line was actually around two feet or so below the red and grey boundary.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 24th, 2012, 8:49 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
Erusia Force wrote:
acelanceloet wrote:
wasn't it common practise to show the actual waterline with an black line on the drawing?
If it is decided that I should do so it will be done. I will post a version with the black line to make everyone happy. The reason I did not and instead placed blue lines is because the waterline differed depending on the amount of consumables on board and the typical line was actually around two feet or so below the red and grey boundary.
well, that is exactly the reason why I always include that black waterline: it shows the waterline but it not dependent on the boot topping or the waterline markers. that said, you may do as you wish, as it seems there is no standard way of doing it.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 24th, 2012, 8:56 pm
Just don't add black line.


Top
[Quote]
eswube
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 24th, 2012, 9:07 pm
Offline
Posts: 10696
Joined: June 15th, 2011, 8:31 am
So the black (plus very dark grey) waterline is NOT part of SB standards?
Forgive me asking for an explicit answer, but I was always convinced it is.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 24th, 2012, 9:55 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
It's up to the individual artist. I prefer it as I normally draw USN vessels which have a defined black boot topping which should be depicted. But if IJN warships did not have boot topping, then IMO it's perfectly acceptable not to show it.

As for my comment re: Thiel, it's in reference to the snippy and rude posting style I've seen coming from him lately. It's just obnoxious and unnecessary.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Erusia Force
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 24th, 2012, 10:19 pm
Offline
Posts: 440
Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
Location: Virginia, USA
IJN Yamato pictured during full speed trials on October 30, 1941. She would still not be activated for another month an a half:

[ img ]

My interpretation:

[ img ]

The marked waterline as some have asked for:

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 24th, 2012, 10:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Great work Erusia, she's beautiful.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 24th, 2012, 10:46 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Looks fantastic either way!

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 5 of 23  [ 225 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 13 4 5 6 723 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]