Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 23  [ 225 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 523 »
Author Message
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 14th, 2012, 8:53 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
If that model is to be believed, those panels look like they've got about one foot of separation! Let's not forget that model companies are subject to the same inaccuracies and "detail freaking" that we are!
Quote:
It give the ship more life than just the Badly detailing and boring
If you guys are so unimpressed with the Shipbucket style, then go and draw in some other style. We have established rules and precedents here for a reason. Cramming detail just for the sake of detail is stupid. I'm tired of hearing this argument that we somehow have a boring and bland style of drawing; if it was really so bad, you guys wouldn't be here!

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
APDAF
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 14th, 2012, 8:56 pm
Offline
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am
Rules can be bent you know, we do it all the time and more often than not we don't know we are doing it.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 14th, 2012, 9:43 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
APDAF wrote:
Rules can be bent you know, we do it all the time and more often than not we don't know we are doing it.
Ignorance isn't an excuse, though I'm not surprised you think so.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 14th, 2012, 10:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I think it is more important to add things like coolwater inlets and the completely correct shape of bilge keels and propellers to the ship, instead of plating. do you have sources for those? then we can talk :P
note that I am known to be rather extreme in that case of detailing, btw

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Erusia Force
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 14th, 2012, 11:55 pm
Offline
Posts: 440
Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
Location: Virginia, USA
Colosseum wrote:
If that model is to be believed, those panels look like they've got about one foot of separation! Let's not forget that model companies are subject to the same inaccuracies and "detail freaking" that we are!
Quote:
It give the ship more life than just the Badly detailing and boring
If you guys are so unimpressed with the Shipbucket style, then go and draw in some other style. We have established rules and precedents here for a reason. Cramming detail just for the sake of detail is stupid. I'm tired of hearing this argument that we somehow have a boring and bland style of drawing; if it was really so bad, you guys wouldn't be here!
Not arguing with you, just though that the details were necessary and the have been removed. The picture of the model is the best image I have of several sources, model and graphic, that were making a big deal of the features. As stated, will remove.
acelanceloet wrote:
I think it is more important to add things like coolwater inlets and the completely correct shape of bilge keels and propellers to the ship, instead of plating. do you have sources for those? then we can talk :P
note that I am known to be rather extreme in that case of detailing, btw
Here you go, what I have been using for props and Keel. Note the lack of detail on inlets, none of the main sources I have show any indication.
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Erusia Force
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 15th, 2012, 8:49 pm
Offline
Posts: 440
Joined: January 18th, 2012, 9:09 pm
Location: Virginia, USA
Main image updated.

As for artistic, it would look like this:
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 15th, 2012, 8:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
if you are done, I expect the belowdeck parts of all systems you have accurate sources for (engines, guns, etc) separate in the belowdeck parts thread, as I see you have the ones for the main turret here. :P
other then that, it is beginning to look good.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
paul_541
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 15th, 2012, 9:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:58 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
Colosseum wrote:
If that model is to be believed, those panels look like they've got about one foot of separation! Let's not forget that model companies are subject to the same inaccuracies and "detail freaking" that we are!
Quote:
It give the ship more life than just the Badly detailing and boring
If you guys are so unimpressed with the Shipbucket style, then go and draw in some other style. We have established rules and precedents here for a reason. Cramming detail just for the sake of detail is stupid. I'm tired of hearing this argument that we somehow have a boring and bland style of drawing; if it was really so bad, you guys wouldn't be here!
Personally I think that isn't bad to talk here about WHERE we must put a limit to the details on SB because the style is always in evolution so... Yes, we doing a kind of art but maybe is the time to update a little bit the rules and our way of action to follow to new ideas (example here with the hull's lines) or just let some liberty to people BUT all must present a finished work without too many details, according to the SB style ... :? I don't know if you all understood my point of view ???

If I talk with my personal's experiences about drawing, I am arrived at some point that I didn't have a choice to don't show some little details because firstly, it was too difficult and secondly, they wasn't good-looking. So, especially in this case for Erusia Force, it's not to be bad with you but maybe you haven't already realize this thing...You will probably see it later with other future projects. ;) Continue your awesome work on the Yamato ! :D

Greetings :)

_________________
My motto:Per ardua ad astra (RCAF)
Current Drawings:
USS Midway CVB-41 and later alterations
HMCS Bonaventure CVL-22 and later alterations
Paul 2024


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 15th, 2012, 9:46 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
The problem is that literally every single artist has created their own rules, and now we have a mish-mash of drawing styles with no coherence. Some ships are technically sound but look dull next to these ships which, IMO, are over-detailed for this style.

But I'm just a dinosaur so don't listen to me.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
paul_541
Post subject: Re: Yamato ClassPosted: November 15th, 2012, 9:56 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 395
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 2:58 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada
Colosseum wrote:
The problem is that literally every single artist has created their own rules, and now we have a mish-mash of drawing styles with no coherence. Some ships are technically sound but look dull next to these ships which, IMO, are over-detailed for this style.

But I'm just a dinosaur so don't listen to me.
It's totally normal and, as you are one of the first ''Shipbucketeers'' ,you are a little bit disappointed here because your SB's ideal style isn't always respected... :roll:

_________________
My motto:Per ardua ad astra (RCAF)
Current Drawings:
USS Midway CVB-41 and later alterations
HMCS Bonaventure CVL-22 and later alterations
Paul 2024


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 23  [ 225 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 523 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]