Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 26 of 27  [ 263 posts ]  Go to page « 123 24 25 26 27 »
Author Message
APDAF
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 14th, 2012, 10:52 pm
Offline
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am
[quote="APDAF"], width of 25.5 meters

:oops:

Wrong ship it should be 18.334 meters.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 14th, 2012, 10:54 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
18.334? consider your ship now broken apart before it hits the bottom.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 14th, 2012, 10:56 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
Apdaf, what you should have with that hull and a more plausible block coefficent of 0,65 is a displacement of about 27.900 tons, if you want the 35.000 rtns figure i suggest you to lenghten the battleship to 255 meters, whithout obviously enlarging the belt or you'll find yourself in the same situation; at that point tough you will have a lenght to beam ratio more similar to a cruiser, so i think a lenght of 235, beam of 29 and draught of 8,2 would be the best option.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 14th, 2012, 10:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
APDAF wrote:
APDAF wrote:
, width of 25.5 meters

:oops:

Wrong ship it should be 18.334 meters.
Your Block Coefficient now exceeds unity.

This is an impossibility.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
APDAF
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 14th, 2012, 10:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am
acelanceloet wrote:
18.334?
Wait, that is my pre-dread I need to find my notes give a while to find them.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 14th, 2012, 11:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I'm with BB 1987 here, apart from one problem. your ship looks of WW1 origin. due to structural constraints of that era, you get size limitations. I would look at queen elisabeth class ships for dimension myself, both in arnament, armour, speed and size. I consider these the ultimate evolution of the WW1 dreadnought (there was an reason they were called 'super dreadnought')

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
APDAF
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 14th, 2012, 11:04 pm
Offline
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am
She is supposed to be a beefed up Queen Elisabeth class with triples instead of twins.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
DaisyDuke
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 25th, 2012, 1:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 16
Joined: November 25th, 2012, 1:10 pm
acelanceloet wrote:
I'm with BB 1987 here, apart from one problem. your ship looks of WW1 origin. due to structural constraints of that era, you get size limitations. I would look at queen elisabeth class ships for dimension myself, both in arnament, armour, speed and size. I consider these the ultimate evolution of the WW1 dreadnought (there was an reason they were called 'super dreadnought')
reason was they had superfiring turrets

_________________
I CANNOT TELL A LIE. I DREW THE MOST BEATIFUL CGBL OF ALL TIME.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 25th, 2012, 1:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
DaisyDuke wrote:
acelanceloet wrote:
I'm with BB 1987 here, apart from one problem. your ship looks of WW1 origin. due to structural constraints of that era, you get size limitations. I would look at queen elisabeth class ships for dimension myself, both in arnament, armour, speed and size. I consider these the ultimate evolution of the WW1 dreadnought (there was an reason they were called 'super dreadnought')
reason was they had superfiring turrets
? I don't get what you mean, superfiring turrets are not what made them super dreadnoughts, and APDAF's design has superfiring turrets so you are not comparing the 2.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 26th, 2012, 8:27 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
The reason why the Queen Elizabeths were termed super Dreadnoughts had nothing to do with super firing turrets whatever that means ? Do you mean super imposed ie one behind and above the other ? The reason was the increase in gun calibre from 13.5" to 15" and the increase in speed from 21 knots to 25 due to the introduction of oil fired rather than coal boilers.I hope this helps.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 26 of 27  [ 263 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 123 24 25 26 27 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]