Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 4  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »
Author Message
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Fictional Amphibious Assault Ship-QuestionPosted: November 6th, 2012, 3:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Thiel wrote:
Gator_Country wrote:
If you're going to use this as an LPH/LHA/LHD, a ski jump just takes up heli landing spots.
That depends on what your priorities are.
Quite. For the US, who has CATOBAR carriers, the increase in capability is outweighed by the loss of usable deck space for helicopter operations. For other nations (Spain, Italy, & Australia) the metric is reversed.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gator_Country
Post subject: Re: Fictional Amphibious Assault Ship-QuestionPosted: November 6th, 2012, 9:29 pm
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: May 21st, 2012, 9:05 pm
Location: The American South
Agreed. He says it's going to be an amphious assault ship, so therefore a ski jump isn't the best idea. I personally can't figure out the point of a ski jump on the Canberras; the Aussies don't have STOVL aircraft to fly off them, and it just takes up helo spots.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: Fictional Amphibious Assault Ship-QuestionPosted: November 6th, 2012, 9:41 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Gator_Country wrote:
Agreed. He says it's going to be an amphious assault ship, so therefore a ski jump isn't the best idea. I personally can't figure out the point of a ski jump on the Canberras; the Aussies don't have STOVL aircraft to fly off them, and it just takes up helo spots.
It was probably cheaper to build the ship with the ski-jump, then redesign it without it. The Canberra was designed by the Spanish Navantia Ferrol Shipyard and is a variation of Spain's Juan Carlos I.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Fictional Amphibious Assault Ship-QuestionPosted: November 6th, 2012, 9:44 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
'the aussies' kept the ski jump because that was cheaper. the canberra class's design is so that the ski jump takes next to none actual deck space, as it is on the very edge of the bow. the fact that they didn't use the spot right next to it for parking, like the invincible class does, says enough about the need and/or possibilities for deck park on that spot.

the drawback of an ramp is that it takes space for helicopter. the advantage of it is that it shortens the runway you need for STOVL aircraft, which frees space for helicopters and parking.

keep in mind that the invincibles originally were envisioned as helicarriers first, harrier carriers second by the RN.

I really begin to question what makes you the amphib expert here, gator country :P

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gator_Country
Post subject: Re: Fictional Amphibious Assault Ship-QuestionPosted: November 6th, 2012, 11:53 pm
Offline
Posts: 99
Joined: May 21st, 2012, 9:05 pm
Location: The American South
Ha-ha indeed. To each their own, I guess. The difference is, as I said, what you intend to use it for. If you're doin STOVL strike aircraft like the Harrier as your primary mission, then yes, a ramp is necessary. If you're usin it as a helicopter carrying amphib, the ramp just wastes flight deck space since choppers don't need it anyway. Everybody has their own ideas though.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
daemyrs
Post subject: Re: Fictional Amphibious Assault Ship-QuestionPosted: November 7th, 2012, 2:42 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 66
Joined: November 5th, 2012, 2:07 pm
ive given him limitations. lets see what he wants now..

_________________
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
daemyrs
Post subject: Re: Fictional Amphibious Assault Ship-QuestionPosted: November 7th, 2012, 2:51 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 66
Joined: November 5th, 2012, 2:07 pm
okay, his revised wish is now ski jump, doors dont matter bc everything will he helo-lifted (which i think he needs the stern hatches for landing craft), and an island that's as small as possible. What would you all suggest?

_________________
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Trojan
Post subject: Re: Fictional Amphibious Assault Ship-QuestionPosted: November 7th, 2012, 3:05 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House
Well like Rodondo said he basically wants a Canberra/Juan Carlos or Cavour class type ship. You can use those ships as a basis. How much of this ships role is amphibious assault versus helicopter/STOVL carrier? This and his fleets composition effects his need for landing craft and a well deck on his ship. For island size, look at the IRL ships I mentioned and others to learn how big the island needs to be, they probably should not be any smaller than those for a realistic ship.
Good luck!

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
daemyrs
Post subject: Re: Fictional Amphibious Assault Ship-QuestionPosted: November 7th, 2012, 4:58 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 66
Joined: November 5th, 2012, 2:07 pm
thanks

_________________
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Fictional Amphibious Assault Ship-QuestionPosted: November 7th, 2012, 7:15 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
And now for something completely different...

Don't double posting daemyrs, use EDIT.

Thank you for attention.

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 4  [ 34 posts ]  Return to “General Discussion” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]