Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 3  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Spaceship scalePosted: October 14th, 2012, 11:12 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
My scale:

HeuHen: 1mtr = 50px


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Carl Miller
Post subject: Re: Spaceship scalePosted: October 14th, 2012, 11:15 pm
Offline
Posts: 5
Joined: October 13th, 2012, 8:58 pm
klagldsf wrote:
Carl Miller wrote:
What scale should I use for spaceships? The one I'm planning to draw is 5 km long, which, at Shipbucket scale, would be 33,333 pixels :?
You're going to be drawing a Star Destroyer?

Unless you're drawing real spaceships (of which currently there is none that would be too big for Shipbucket scale) you're better off using whatever arbitrary scale you think works best. We're not going to be uploading it to the database anyway since that would be potentially sticky from a copyright issue.
No, I'm drawing a spaceship from a conworld that I'm building, and thus is of my own creation :P


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Morten812
Post subject: Re: Spaceship scalePosted: October 16th, 2012, 6:08 pm
Offline
Posts: 282
Joined: September 16th, 2011, 7:02 am
Location: Denmark
Contact: Website
I draw my own Sci-fi AU spaceships in SB-scala - very much unscientific, partially based on normal groundbased warships, using similarly weapons-systems and a yet undefined propulsion system - as a said very unscientific :D

This is a fregat size multi-role support ship:

[ img ]

And a smaller multi-role FAC

[ img ]

Their flexible containerised weaponsmodules are based on Danish standard-flex design and draw by MConrads.

Didn't plan to upload this but the subject came up :lol:

_________________
Morten812

Morten Jensen
Randers
Denmark

Traffic Manager


Last edited by Morten812 on October 16th, 2012, 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Spaceship scalePosted: October 16th, 2012, 6:20 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Actually they were drawn by McConrads.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Morten812
Post subject: Re: Spaceship scalePosted: October 16th, 2012, 6:39 pm
Offline
Posts: 282
Joined: September 16th, 2011, 7:02 am
Location: Denmark
Contact: Website
Sorry Thiel - just thought you did the Standard Flex, my mistake

_________________
Morten812

Morten Jensen
Randers
Denmark

Traffic Manager


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
APDAF
Post subject: Re: Spaceship scalePosted: October 16th, 2012, 6:43 pm
Offline
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am
Remember that battleships will be king in space rather than carriers due to fuel/orbital mechanics.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Spaceship scalePosted: October 16th, 2012, 6:50 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
remember that artificial gravity is aimed the same way as the propulsion is. so, nose is top :P basically the only spaceship design I have seen that takes that in account is the rocket from tintin :P

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Spaceship scalePosted: October 16th, 2012, 6:52 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
APDAF wrote:
Remember that battleships will be king in space rather than carriers due to fuel/orbital mechanics.
That depends on a lot of the rules for the setting. If jamming is high, FTL drives are small but expensive, and ranges are long then expect fighters (in some form, remember a Sopwith Camel and a YF-12 are both 'fighters', even though one is 100 times the weight and 20 times as fast as the other). A 'Space fighter' might be closer in size to what we think of as a missile boat or a large bomber than a modern day fighter.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Morten812
Post subject: Re: Spaceship scalePosted: October 16th, 2012, 6:53 pm
Offline
Posts: 282
Joined: September 16th, 2011, 7:02 am
Location: Denmark
Contact: Website
As i said, totally unscientific :lol:

_________________
Morten812

Morten Jensen
Randers
Denmark

Traffic Manager


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
APDAF
Post subject: Re: Spaceship scalePosted: October 16th, 2012, 7:05 pm
Offline
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am
TimothyC wrote:
If jamming is high, FTL drives are small but expensive, and ranges are long then expect fighters.
Well that mostly wrong because:
1) There is no point in jamming in space due to being no stealth in space.
2) A FTL drive will be huge and require huge amount of power and a fighter will not be able to house the fusion reactors needed.
3) A fighter will never have a range more than the local gravity well unless you use a highly compacted fuel source, oxygen tanks, food and water are also needed for a long flight and it is easier to store such items in a huge battleship than a 100 ton fighter.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 3  [ 27 posts ]  Return to “General Discussion” | Go to page « 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]