Posts:2936 Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
If every old warship was preserved we'd be seeing hundreds of them clogging up the docks; also, by preserving her we'd loose the name to any future warships - and that really would be a shame!
My rare weigh-in on this sort of matter: yes. You don't get to keep everything.
Posts:511 Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
We have a word for people who refuse to throw things away. But its still sad that she's being sold.
_________________ Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked. Korean AU
This leads to an interesting question then, and one that may be better in a separate thread...how does the RN "reorganize" in the face of probable budget cuts? What sort of strategic plan could be compiled and how would that affect the number and types of warships in service?
Posts:310 Joined: April 28th, 2011, 11:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Well, other then the British Overseas Territories I don't see a lot of a need for long-range naval operations. I also don't see the need for nearly as much nuclear deterrent. The British Navy being so strong was a product of it's needs as a massive colonial empire and the naval races of old.
_________________ Probably posting from and iPhone and naval terms befuddle it. If I say a ships' hill, you know what I meant.
OK so what does that mean for the planned aircraft carriers? One is already supposed to go to reserve. Does either survive? Especially with the changes in development of the F-35...Also, does this mean the end of the SSNs?