Shipbucket

We're either just arguing semantics or just arguing for the sake of arguing.

Yes its a nuclear reactor, but its not a S8G or something like that.

If Visby isnt in the ASW business someone should tell her, because she has a ton of ASW stuff onboard.

The CONOPS for this vessel is diffrent from typical Navy doctrine, I'll go into that concept when I post some more pics. Blue water ASW isnt as big a concern as Brwon water for this class of ship. Probably only mentioning its escort duty was probably misleading. This ship is taking he place of LCS. Combat in the littorals is the primary mission.

Alot of it was inspired by this quote from the Princess Bride ... "You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in a land war in Asia"

like what? you can do it by pm, but I'd really like to know what I say wrong according to you. we are not arguing, we are criticizing your design so it gets better.
great to be linked to my own thread. note that every single LWNP ship on the bucket is created by me, so you are refering me to know more about my own knowledge?
also, why go electrical?
no it is not. but it is an nuclear reactor, which gives you near unlimited operational range and way less refueling ops for an smaller usefull displacement. so, what, apart the scale, makes the LWNP that much different from the S8G or other models? 37'' as in less then 1 meter? and then it is the same size as the Mk 45?

also, I was not talking about how accurate it was. I said it was good for measuring systems against each other, not that it was good for perfect accuracy.
ok
ok then, but I still think this is wasted space. it is not like this ship will ever go alone against more then 2 other ships. if 4 missiles per ship can't damage it, 8 won't either.
oceangoing ASW, with long range sonar and ASROC and helicopters is completely something else then coastal ASW, with mines, depth charges and similar stuff. the long range ASW weapon of the visby are torpedo tubes, are the short range weapons of about every frigate.

note that the noise is important for your maximum sonar speed. you need to be able to keep up with your battlegroup while your sonar still works, when you go less then 18 knots and the sound of an opening in the hull obscures the sonar, well, yeah... you'd be an sitting duck. and that is exactly what this bow thruster does. then, in what, is this ship better than some littoral combat ships? they still need long range cover, and escaping from them as submarine, aircraft or surface simple: just get out of range.
np, and can't wait

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Here is a picture for the concept of operations for such a vessel. This scenario revolves around 3 objectives, 1. controlling sea lines of communication, 2. harbor control, and 3 landing amphibious forces ashore. Based on the tiered defense strategy, this tiered attack would rely on a carrier furthest out from the shore conducting air strikes and enforcing a no-fly zone. They would be responsible for sorties into the country to damage key military infrastructure. The tier 2 attackers (DDGs and SSN/SSGNs) would be responsible for Naval Gun Fire Support and cruise missile strikes to further weaken military infrastructure. Also they would deal with any anti-ship cruise missiles or anything that escaped the third tier. The third tier is closest to shore, they would be in the greatest amount of danger and would be responsible for clearing mines, enaging coastal patrol craft, defeating subs in the littorals, as well as larger surface combatants that are trying to penetrate to tier 2 and tier 1 zones.

another angle/view

What kind of gun is that, 76mm or 127mm? Is it based off the AGS?

_________________
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU

Pretty cool CG!

I still see no drawing which I can judge the hull shape from.
also, that gun looks small for an 76 (mostly in width) so don't expect this to work for 127

also, your tier 3 looks like 'playing target' to me, as they don't do anything tier 2 can do, let alone that tier 1 does not cover. and if they cannot operate without the other tiers, they are an waste of money IMO.

and, are you going to adress the points I made above?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Any plans to draw in SB scale?

_________________

Jabba's Worklist

I really dont know how to do SB scale so probably no time soon. I've looked at the tutorials and stuff. Working in pixels seems really difficult to me. Props to those who can do it and do it well.

''I am good and all knowing and I know it''

But then you are God himself!