Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
Cruel2BEkind
Post subject: Prototype WeaponPosted: September 30th, 2012, 10:44 pm
Offline
Posts: 272
Joined: May 12th, 2012, 12:34 am
Location: Phoenix,Arizona
Can 'Metal Storm' Technology be used in small 100-130mm cannons used on ships?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFjGbOyd2ek

_________________
Coming soon....
-Carrier Submarine?
-Missile Interceptor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Prototype WeaponPosted: September 30th, 2012, 11:04 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
well yes, but i think it will have a disadvantage on big caliber cannons. but at smaller caliber self defenc weapons they can be a god weapon.

But on a naval vessel I think this weapon technology can possibly be used in a type of a ASW mortar system.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Prototype WeaponPosted: September 30th, 2012, 11:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Metal Storm stuff just doesn't make sense in the real world. It's main advantage is the high instantaneous rate of fire, but for sustained fire you need to have to start accounting for barrel swap times, which are not going to be pretty. With AAA the main thing you want to do is throw larger rounds down range, not more smaller rounds. If you want a really advanced gun and you are not including AAA as a main mission, I'd look at something like VGAS (Vertical Gun for Advanced Ships).

The biggest knock against Metal Storm is that the largest gun they've had a contract for is functionally a 5 round shotgun. It's not something to inspire confidence.

_________________
๐Œ๐€๐“๐‡๐๐„๐“- ๐‘ป๐’ ๐‘ช๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’•๐’‚๐’•๐’† ๐’‚๐’๐’… ๐’•๐’ ๐‘บ๐’๐’๐’—๐’†


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: Prototype WeaponPosted: October 1st, 2012, 12:40 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Cruel2BEkind wrote:
Can 'Metal Storm' Technology be used in small 100-130mm cannons used on ships?
Sure it can - but in addition to what Tim said, the RoF advantage Metal Storm has over more conventional, high-RoF guns (like Mk 45) all but disappears at that scale. Especially when you factor in any weight penalty, assuming you're just scaling up current Metal Storm models.

That's not to say that the idea of an "electric gun" is dumbfounded - in fact that's the idea behind a railgun and coilgun (or even better, a multi-stage coilgun). What Metal Storm really does is add unnecessary complication to those ideas, basically making a Nordenfelt coil-gun.

Why? Because it's cool, probably.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Prototype WeaponPosted: October 1st, 2012, 10:33 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
This is the only rapid-firing gun you need on a ship.

[ img ]

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Prototype WeaponPosted: October 1st, 2012, 10:48 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
silly you, the red army with nuclear missiles is all you need.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Master Chief Brown
Post subject: Re: Prototype WeaponPosted: October 17th, 2012, 5:08 am
Offline
Posts: 19
Joined: October 16th, 2012, 11:23 pm
Location: Hawaii
This might have potential on the naval scene. Naval ships could use it to repel possible boarders: a scenario unlikely in this day and age, but something the USN still trains for. Put one of those at each of the hatches leading inside, as well as positioned to sweep the forecastle and stern, and any boarders attempting to gain entry are going to be a rapidly disintegrating cloud of atoms.
Right now, with the technology we have available to us, I don't think it would be good in a CIWS capacity. 20mm is about the smallest you can get and still have a reasonable chance at knocking down an ASM on final approach (CIWS, especially Phalanx or Goalkeeper, is never relied upon by ship commanders to stop inbounds). The complexities of loading it, as well as attempting to knock down something around the speed of sound with what are glorified lead kamikazes sent out in rapid succession mean that a gatling based weapon is still better than Metal Storm.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ]  Return to โ€œGeneral Discussionโ€

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]