Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 5  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »
Author Message
Philbob
Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight IIIPosted: August 8th, 2012, 8:12 pm
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
these ships will only be the "technology insertion ships" or the transition ships Flight III wont start until DDG-122. DDG-113 to 116 are the restart, 117 to 121 are transitory, AMDR will be introduced in DDG-122. plans call for around 24 ships as of now but this could change including the restart and transitions platforms.

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cybermax
Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight IIIPosted: August 9th, 2012, 6:07 pm
Offline
Posts: 331
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:41 pm
Will they refer to the transition ships as Flight IIb?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Philbob
Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight IIIPosted: August 13th, 2012, 7:16 am
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
they should.

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight IIIPosted: August 22nd, 2012, 8:06 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
Any Thinking on the DDG-117/121 because these vessels will be "Technology Insertion Ships" (They PROGRESSIVELY integrate various systems currently under development).

Some Thinking about Arleigh-Burke Flight-III (DDG-122 and beyond...FY 2016-2031)
[ img ]

Some Thinking about a Hypothetical (but unlikely ?) Arleigh-Burke Flight-IV (maybe ? around FY 2032-2041...)
[ img ]

If some interested to draw it ?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight IIIPosted: August 22nd, 2012, 8:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
may I see your sources? some of the 'concepts' you are referring to are very unlikely (I mean, laser CIWS, huge funnels with radar 'traps', AGS? get real!) and many of the parts you chose to show here are from ships that are.... well just shipbucket designs. with all due respect, some exceptions apart, these are not designs of naval or electrical engineers, and by that only approach what is possible. IMO, it is not an good idea to start discussing an future design with shipbucket designs as referece.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
mrld27
Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight IIIPosted: September 22nd, 2012, 12:44 am
Offline
Posts: 16
Joined: May 17th, 2012, 12:19 am
Those designs look pretty neat at least from my perspective. I mean of course they're shipbucket designs but still it's always fun to speculate on what future designs might hold. There's been considerable speculation out there about what Flight III might be like.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight IIIPosted: September 22nd, 2012, 1:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
mrld27 wrote:
Those designs look pretty neat at least from my perspective. I mean of course they're shipbucket designs but still it's always fun to speculate on what future designs might hold. There's been considerable speculation out there about what Flight III might be like.
It`s based on the current official Lockheed Martin design of the Flight III


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zagor05
Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight IIIPosted: September 22nd, 2012, 9:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 42
Joined: July 1st, 2012, 1:17 pm
Location: Winterfell,
why Burke Flight III do not have CIWS guns, i mean even flight II didnt have them?,

_________________
I find lack of humor disturbing....


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight IIIPosted: September 22nd, 2012, 9:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9102
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
because the ESSM has taken over most of that role. and the concept drawings off thus ships did not have them to.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zagor05
Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight IIIPosted: September 22nd, 2012, 9:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 42
Joined: July 1st, 2012, 1:17 pm
Location: Winterfell,
somehow i doubt ESSM can protect ship against larger swarm of enemy missiles, if i watch today defense of current modern destroyers and frigates i would say not enough, but thats only my own opinion,

_________________
I find lack of humor disturbing....


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 5  [ 42 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]