Shipbucket

SeaSparrow

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

I believe I may go with the SPS-49 instead of the -52 now.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor

Sounds like a plan. I would also second Thiel's comment about Sea Sparrow.

At this point, other than sliding the gun aft oh, 5-10 feet so it clears the sonar spaces It's a good, solid layout that just needs detailing (surface search and navigation/weather radars - these are the bar radars over the bridge; connect the two parts of the superstructure; mount a small platform for the Mk 95 radar you have there; and other general detailing).

A fine looking ship!

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

Futzed with it some more.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor

I like it although I do have two questions:

1. Is there a reason for the two surface search sets? It looks like one SPS-10 set and one SPS-67 set.
2. I presume you are not using the SLQ-32? I say that because the real SLQ-32 is found in the USN thread here.

Oh, also nets around the helideck.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆

Ilike it too, though i doubt the carrying of such a large RHIB, since that shift came only in the latter part of the 1990s. However, you can re-date this one and put a normal cutter or personnel motorboat in its place to make it more like 1982! Feel free to scavenge my drawings around this community, if you need to find a suitable one.

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen

Must have grabbed the wrong , older, drawing out of my "equipment" folder, because it is supposed to be the SLQ-32.

I misread my source for the sps-67. I thought the sps-10 was part of the suite. Upon further reading I see I was mistaken. Ideas on what I can put there instead?

Still a WIP, haven't got to most of the handrails and nets yet. Also, on that note, any other ASW gear I may be missing I ought think about putting on there?

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor

Maybe a towed sonar array?
I have no idea if its too early for such a piece of equipment or if it will even fit, but just an idea

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!

I'd add a second SeaSparrow director below and aft of the one you have now and then I'd place both of them on a small deck house that would hold 16 reloads.
I'd also add a platform around the ECM set.
I have more, but I'll need to make a few illustrations to show what I mean.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

This is an approximation of how your bridge is laid out. As you might imagine, rearwards visibility is going to be rather limited. Considering the length you've gone to to provide defences against asymmetric threats this makes little sense to me. It's also going to make close manoeuvring, such as during UNREP, even harder than it already is.
Given the time frame I'd also add a couple of whip antennas and lastly (for now ) I'd move the anchors further forward so they clear the sonar.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.