Shipbucket

So, you're saying that CV-67 and CVN-79 were/will be named inappropriately, or am I reading you wrong?

_________________
Fasismi? Ei! Natsismin? Ei! Kommunismi? Ei! Elostelu!

The difference is in the case of Kennedy and Reagan, they were great leaders who actually served in some capacity in the Navy. In Gabriel Giffords' case, it's just the wrong kind of pandering. That's just my very political opinion.

Now could I say the Japanese are the best? The never change their ship naming convention

^ exactly, same with the RAN more or less

_________________
Work list(Current)
Miscellaneous|Victorian Colonial Navy|Murray Riverboats|Colony of Victoria AU|Project Sail-fixing SB's sail shortage
How to mentally pronounce my usernameRow-(as in a boat)Don-(as in the short form of Donald)Dough-(bread)
"Loitering on the High Seas" (Named after the good ship Rodondo)
There's no such thing as "nothing left to draw" If you can down 10 pints and draw, you're doing alright by my standards

I personally belive CVN-79 was innaprorpirate in the since that there already was a USS JFk, more so when you figure in the current Kennedy clan has done nothing worthy of the honor or even partakes in the naval service in over 4 decades.

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets

It's not quite as appropriate as the old JFK is at least very close towards being taken off the register.

Page 6 of the report:

"Cost to prepare this report: $62,707"

_________________
World's Best Okayest Author and Artist

No wonder we are $13 trillion in debt

I think the one thing the report misses is that perk of Naming warships for the SECNAV is a privilege and not a right one that can be removed. whats really incredible is how little respect Mabus has for the average sailor and Marine and how bad he has messed up his "Green the Fleet" initiative which is legitimately important.

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets