-the hangar/hull bend is black on your drawing but should be grey, as it is the same angle as the one at the bridge structure
- take an good look at the topmast
- why do the flags spell the burke's callsign?
in other words: remove those signal flags, or at least make something useful of it
- aft SPY-1 arrays (or better said, the structure around it) seems to be different from burke flight 2
- bridge wings should not be exact copies of flight 2
- anchor looks wrong
- the RHIB hatch seems to end a bit high....
- I might be wrong, but the lifefrafts on the hangar seem to be not entirely in position. they seem to show at least part of the forward VLS on the hangar, while the aft one is entirely shown.
http://www.c7f.navy.mil/imagery/high-re ... 01-822.jpg
- navigation radar on the mainmast looks different from what you have
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... G_991).jpg
- note the differences in colour between the different air intakes. the colour of the intakes seems a bit dark altogether, btw
- you might be able to make that ECM devie on the bridge look a bit better.
- there is an piece of railing missing between the SPY-1 and the mast.
- quite a few edges between structure and hull/deck are rounded, many of yours are diagonals or straight lines.
- there is some sort of block on the hangar which is missing on yours.
- there is something aft of your bridge structure, I think decoy launchers. these are not on your drawing.
- I might be wrong, but are you sure these ships carry SH-60?
and the last note: details, details DETAILS. that is the only thing, apart from the above, to perfect this ship. the back of the hangar is littered with stuff, nothing is visible here. so is the UNREP station just below the RAM. also, the lights on the bridge. said simply, start looking at pictures and find every detail that is worth to spend 2 or more pixels on. IMO, you have no excuse to NOT make these ships perfect, with all the refs and high-res pictures of them.
good luck, but you are almost there!