Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 24 of 27  [ 263 posts ]  Go to page « 122 23 24 25 26 27 »
Author Message
KHT
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: August 17th, 2012, 5:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1396
Joined: November 19th, 2011, 12:49 pm
Becouse:
klagldsf wrote:
And every single one of those is a 50,000+ ton ship. That's not what you have.
APDAF, the drawing has a lot of potential, but your habit to ignore any advice comming your way frankly ruins any chances of you achieving a complete and solid design, unless you get into some heavy-duty researching. Our advice is the shortcut, so I strongly suggest you follow them.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Clonecommander6454
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: August 17th, 2012, 5:00 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 760
Joined: August 8th, 2011, 2:35 pm
First, look at the mast.
[ img ]
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: August 17th, 2012, 5:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
APDAF wrote:
Why will it not work?
structural integrety, weight limits, stability........

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
APDAF
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: August 17th, 2012, 5:02 pm
Offline
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am
I did not think he (Clone) was talking about that belt.

And Clone that is the old drawing.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Raxar
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: August 17th, 2012, 8:29 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1407
Joined: August 31st, 2011, 4:49 pm
Location: Michigan
APDAF wrote:
And Clone that is the old drawing.
...which has the same masts... :roll:
APDAF wrote:
The bit at the bow yes, it is for mainly two reasons one of them slightly suicidal at best the first reason is there is a mini ice-age going on and sometimes the north sea might freeze but not enough for an icebreaker to be needed
Then explain why countries like Finland, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, etc. have more IB's than BB's, even during the early 1900's. A battleship (or other types of warships) is not intended to be used as an icebreaker, that's why IB's remain a separate class of vessels. If you wanted and Icebreaking warship, you would mount guns on a big icebreaker.
APDAF wrote:
the other reason is as pure and simple as ramming I know it's a rather outdated form of attack.
If you know it's a rather outdated attack, why would you incorperate it? Ramming was considered a last ditch effort, even on vessels specifically designed for it (infact, the HMS Polyphemos had a bow mounted torpedo known as the "Suicide torpedo"). All the crazy ideas of ramming ships into each other had pretty much died out by 1910. If you think about it, a battleship is ill suited for a ramming attack anyways, it's big, slow, difficult to manuver, and expensive.

_________________
Worklist

"If people never did silly things nothing intelligent would ever get done." ~Ludwig Wittgenstein


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: August 17th, 2012, 9:44 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Raxar, Sweden did have a pair of coastal battleships, HMSs Gustaf V and Drottning Victoria designed with icebreaker bows. Their third sister, the class-leader Sverige did not feature that, however. Also, Finland had their pair of coastal armored vessels so outfitted, and I believe Golly has drawn that class. APDAFs bow is not very conducive to function as an icebreaker bow though.

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Raxar
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: August 17th, 2012, 10:04 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1407
Joined: August 31st, 2011, 4:49 pm
Location: Michigan
bezobrazov wrote:
Raxar, Sweden did have a pair of coastal battleships, HMSs Gustaf V and Drottning Victoria designed with icebreaker bows. Their third sister, the class-leader Sverige did not feature that, however. Also, Finland had their pair of coastal armored vessels so outfitted, and I believe Golly has drawn that class. APDAFs bow is not very conducive to function as an icebreaker bow though.
Ah, did not know that, you learn something new every day. :)

_________________
Worklist

"If people never did silly things nothing intelligent would ever get done." ~Ludwig Wittgenstein


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
APDAF
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 13th, 2012, 4:31 pm
Offline
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am
UPDATED:
Replace the main guns to a more updated version.
Added more casemates.
Reworked the stern.
And other updates.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
BB1987
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 13th, 2012, 4:44 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2818
Joined: May 23rd, 2012, 1:01 pm
Location: Rome - Italy
i just noticed you had the winch/capstan on the bow forward of the anchors, i suggest you to put it aft because like that it will not work. the older single trunked funnel looked good to me, so you can either stick with it or with the new ones, your choice obviously.

_________________
My Worklist
Sources and documentations are the most welcome.

-Koko Kyouwakoku (Republic of Koko)
-Koko's carrier-based aircrafts of WWII
-Koko Kaiun Yuso Kaisha - KoKaYu Line (Koko AU spinoff)
-Koko - Civil Aviation


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
APDAF
Post subject: Re: Britannia Class Battleship MK 2Posted: November 13th, 2012, 5:48 pm
Offline
Posts: 1508
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:42 am
Oh um :oops: I will fix that.

I prefer my two separate funnels as the old one was very fugly.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 24 of 27  [ 263 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 122 23 24 25 26 27 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]