» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 5  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »
[Print view]
Author Message
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: CVVPosted: August 12th, 2012, 9:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Cowboy40 wrote:
If i could get you to make a "special variant" CVS version with SQS-53 sonar I would appriciate it. Then I could use her as my new build CVS in my AU timeline I am working on. The sonar would be used in conjunction with an ASW information Center....A more advanced version of what would have been found on the Essex class ASW refits of the 1960's. Her air wing would consist of twelve SH-3 or SH-60F, ten S-3 Vikings, twp E-2C Hawkeye, and twelve F-18 fighters....the air wing depends on the time frame

I'll see what I can do over the next few weeks following finals next week.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: CVVPosted: August 13th, 2012, 1:33 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
You're right, ace, I went on a Fool's Errand there. I ought to have refreshed my knowledge of these vessels, which, alas, I did only afterwards. However, I'm satisfied that you agree that the number sequence is wrong though, since, with Carter being defeated in 1980, by Ronald Reagan, a maximum of only two might have been envisaged -that is, if Carter and his SecDef, Harold Brown and SecNav Edward Hidalgo could've managed to push them through a very skeptical and recalcitrant Congress.

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cowboy40
Post subject: Re: CVVPosted: August 13th, 2012, 2:50 am
Offline
Posts: 26
Joined: August 10th, 2012, 2:36 pm
TimothyC wrote:
Cowboy40 wrote:
If i could get you to make a "special variant" CVS version with SQS-53 sonar I would appriciate it. Then I could use her as my new build CVS in my AU timeline I am working on. The sonar would be used in conjunction with an ASW information Center....A more advanced version of what would have been found on the Essex class ASW refits of the 1960's. Her air wing would consist of twelve SH-3 or SH-60F, ten S-3 Vikings, twp E-2C Hawkeye, and twelve F-18 fighters....the air wing depends on the time frame

I'll see what I can do over the next few weeks following finals next week.
Thanks in advance....
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
nebnoswal
Post subject: Re: CVVPosted: August 15th, 2012, 11:35 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 43
Joined: August 14th, 2010, 5:50 pm
Location: Down under
Thats way better than any of my attempts that I've been trying for the past 12 months.

_________________
cheers
Ben of Oz
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: CVVPosted: August 16th, 2012, 10:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
made the beforementioned fixes and fixed the airwing.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: CVVPosted: August 18th, 2012, 4:34 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
acelanceloet wrote:
consider this v1, please comment if you see any flaws or problems in the drawing.
of course, her side would be littered with openings and liferafts, but I decided to leave them off to show her lines and because I don't know where they could be (I can estimate based on other ships, but that is just an as bad representation as to leave them of, IMO)
For Side & Flight-Deck details (railing, opening & liferafts)
You can "reasonably" help you with some others US Carrier drawing, such as:
[ img ]

or the USS-Nimitz
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: CVVPosted: August 18th, 2012, 4:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
Quote:
but I decided to leave them off to show her lines and because I don't know where they could be (I can estimate based on other ships, but that is just an as bad representation as to leave them of, IMO)
I hate it when people not even read what they quote
I CHOSE NOT TO COPY OTHER SHIPS ON PURPOSE!

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Cowboy40
Post subject: Re: CVVPosted: August 19th, 2012, 12:54 am
Offline
Posts: 26
Joined: August 10th, 2012, 2:36 pm
acelanceloet wrote:
Quote:
but I decided to leave them off to show her lines and because I don't know where they could be (I can estimate based on other ships, but that is just an as bad representation as to leave them of, IMO)
I hate it when people not even read what they quote
I CHOSE NOT TO COPY OTHER SHIPS ON PURPOSE!
I like what I am seeing so far..I thank you for not just copying other ships...
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: CVVPosted: August 19th, 2012, 2:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
acelanceloet wrote:
Quote:
but I decided to leave them off to show her lines and because I don't know where they could be (I can estimate based on other ships, but that is just an as bad representation as to leave them of, IMO)
I hate it when people not even read what they quote
I CHOSE NOT TO COPY OTHER SHIPS ON PURPOSE!
He didn't say you should. He said you could use other ships to guestimate where many of the details should go.
And I agree with him, because rigth now the ship looks half-finished.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Triton
Post subject: Re: CVVPosted: August 24th, 2012, 7:00 pm
Offline
Posts: 30
Joined: September 2nd, 2010, 12:56 am
The CVV was intended to operate V/STOL aircraft. How about some additional V/SOL aircraft in the ship drawing?

What about the Convair 200 V/STOL fighter?

[ img ]

Rockwell XFV-12?

[ img ]

I wonder if the CVVs would have been named for famous naval battles. USS Philippine Sea? USS Leyte Gulf?
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 5  [ 43 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]