You've omitted the darker lines under the overhangs, and it is Shipbucket standard to differentiate between the hull and the upper works by a darker shade to the hull.
Actually the hull and the superstructure are different colors. And there are darker lines under the overhangs. I guess I should have used more contrast shades? One more thing: is it better to use the original color scheme or stick to ShipBucket's standard?
Also, we don't as a rule show guns trained out but fore and aft.
Ok. According to the blueprint ALL of the small guns (that are not in turrets) are facing sides directly or in 45 degree angle. Does it mean I should just remove them from the drawing? I just want to be clear
small error in name credit
Not CA (heavy cruisers), but more likely AC (armored cruiser)
It's
ACR to be exact. I'll fix that.
+ maybe ? a small handfull of error in very small details, but not dramatic
The thing is I can't tell a dramatic error from a small one
Could you point them out please so I could avoid them in the future?
Your ship config ? in early or late career ?...
I used what I believe is the original blueprints so I'd say it's "as launched".
Thanks you guys for the feedback!