Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 2  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2
Author Message
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: OPV/LCS?Posted: November 8th, 2010, 2:00 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
[ img ]

This should take care of most of the problems of the above design.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: OPV/LCS?Posted: November 8th, 2010, 2:31 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
[ img ]
no, again no. the gun can be placed over there (the ammo storage is underneath it, but it is quite large, the entire deckhouse is filled with it) , but you have even increased the top weight, the SEARAM can't turn over there and it has an very limited firing angle, and the VLS wont'fit over there, because you still have pierced a lot of space which is needed.
and you are still using an outdated drawing.

if you want these weapons on board, you have to redesign the ship, by lengthening it (by 30 m or so), reinforce the entire ship, putting an more powerfull engine on board........ done? now you see, you have made an frigate of it! but you didn't needed an frigate.......

the closest to your requirements would be the american lcs, if you want to have an opv you could just use the normal holland class, with weapon MODIFICATIONS instead of additions, as I said in the previous posts.

and I know what I am talking about, I have an very good knowledge of this ship because of my work on this: http://acelanceloet.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d2ytnhg

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: OPV/LCS?Posted: November 8th, 2010, 4:11 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
[ img ]
[ img ]

You think ACE?
You can modify your ammo storage to any size.
This one has a small one for sure.
I have been on it, and its uber uber uber small!
Its smaller then an alkmaar class (You can see that in SB drawings to)

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: OPV/LCS?Posted: November 8th, 2010, 4:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
MitcheLL300 wrote:
[ img ]
You think ACE?
You can modify your ammo storage to any size.
This one has a small one for sure.
I have been on it, and its uber uber uber small!
Its smaller then an alkmaar class (You can see that in SB drawings to)
ok, that's true, but that doesn't mean you can put an BLOODY VLS just behind it. and it is not an good idea to give an oceangoing warship the magazine size of an coastal FAC..... it is possible indeed, but I would prefer more bullets on board above that VLS. you have brought me on an idea though....

@ spambot: I will work on the holland a bit to give it better air defence for service in my AU..... so maybe you can use that one. it might take some time before I finish it, though.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: OPV/LCS?Posted: November 9th, 2010, 5:12 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
I agree even with this configuration, it is drifting more into the area of Frigate than Gunboat/OPV. One idea I'm still playing with is completing the last of the FREMMs as gunboats rather than normal FFGs with downgraded systems from the APAR/Smart-L vessels currently being procured. Another idea possibly along those lines is a modernized OHP type vessel, which makes great OPV/gunboat. If mine weren't approaching 30 years old, then there would be little need for anything else. Much food for thought....

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: OPV/LCS?Posted: November 16th, 2010, 5:39 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
[ img ]

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

This is my impression of what the above mentioned vessel would look like, rather much like the base Cybele Klasse on the outside, but with less complicated systems, in place of the APAR/SMART-L combo, as this isn't an AAW platform. Otherwise there are internal differences, such as diesel cruising engines, and a layout more geared towards endurance and accomodation. This design works out better in many regards, especially operating in a conflict zone, in case that semi-literate third world jet jockey decides you look like an enemy vessel, or his thuggish bosses decide you *are* an enemy vessel.

The forward gun is my take on a modernized, updated TAK-120.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: OPV/LCS?Posted: November 16th, 2010, 2:56 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
use the new oto 76 stealth..... and may I ask why it is so much better in conflict zones? it looks like an normal frigate, apart from the fact it is light in the missile arnament and heavy in the amount of guns.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: OPV/LCS?Posted: November 16th, 2010, 3:37 pm
You aren't Dutch? Kanoneerboot.. That means Gunboat you know..


Top
[Quote]
Obsydian Shade
Post subject: Re: OPV/LCS?Posted: November 17th, 2010, 3:52 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 797
Joined: August 13th, 2010, 5:44 am
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
Quote:
and may I ask why it is so much better in conflict zones? it looks like an normal frigate, apart from the fact it is light in the missile arnament and heavy in the amount of guns.
It is better in a conflict zone because it has much better self defence capability in the form of ESSM, and more CIWS with the RAM and heavy gun armament.
Quote:
You aren't Dutch? Kanoneerboot.. That means Gunboat you know..
The design is for my AU, Pallamara whose national language is Dutch. Yes, I know that Kanonneerboot is gunboat in Dutch. With its heavy gun armament, and light missile armament, the Pallamarans don't quite consider it a full fledged frigate, even though it's based off a frigate hull. Also, its mission of distant patrol off troubled areas like Somalia, hearkens back to the old gunboat role, hence the designation. Conceptually, I was inspired by the German navy that does much the same thing with their F-125(?) frigates, but with Pallamara, they have the FREMM design in production so it was more cost effective to modify one of those hulls since they have up to six more planned whose future was in question.

_________________
We can't stop here--this is Bat country!

If it's close enough to cast a shadow, I think the flying house wins initiative.

Bronies are like the Forsworn. Everyone agrees that they are a problem but nobody wants to expend the energy rooting them out.

"That is a very graphic analogy which aids understanding wonderfully while being, strictly speaking, wrong in every possible way."


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: OPV/LCS?Posted: January 4th, 2011, 11:14 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I'd go for a Thetis class OPV with increased aviation facilities.
Their cruising speed is just a tad higher than most merchant ships, they've got the speed and endurance for prolonged patrols, they are cheap to operate, got enough speed to run down most skiffs and plenty firepower for the job.
[ img ]

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 2  [ 20 posts ]  Return to “General Discussion” | Go to page « 1 2

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]