Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 86 of 137  [ 1362 posts ]  Go to page « 184 85 86 87 88137 »
Author Message
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor DesignsPosted: July 1st, 2012, 4:15 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
I've been thinking lately about perhaps doing some "adversary" ships as well as Grays Harbor ones, and was wondering if anybody might like to collaborate on that? Just a thought I had.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor DesignsPosted: July 1st, 2012, 4:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I might be interested.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor DesignsPosted: July 1st, 2012, 4:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
Thiel wrote:
I might be interested.
:D I was hoping you would be.

I'll be putting together a brief background synopsis and overview tonight when I get home from work and I'll shoot you a copy to see what you think, or if you have any suggestions/ideas.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor DesignsPosted: July 1st, 2012, 5:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Fire away. I've just started working 12 hour night shifts though, so drawing is probably going to be slow.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor DesignsPosted: July 1st, 2012, 7:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
Meh. Speed is not an issue.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor DesignsPosted: July 2nd, 2012, 6:35 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
The Quinn Bay in her experimental paint scheme worn in 1943-44

[ img ]

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor DesignsPosted: July 2nd, 2012, 7:20 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
Zephyr wrote:
My first foray into submarines.....

Great White Class (1919-23)
[ img ]
Scifibug wrote:
Zephyr,

Your Great White class looks like a good beginning but looks incomplete to me.
Shading maybe?
And the small bits every ship has outside of the prelimary design.
Thought I might revisit this one from a while back. My first try at a submarine, so I'm not at all familiar with the ins-n-outs of them. I haven't made any changes as yet to the initial drawing, thought I'd get a couple more opinions on how to proceed to make it look less like a, well. glorified cigar tube?

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
travestytrav25
Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor DesignsPosted: July 2nd, 2012, 12:46 pm
Offline
Posts: 270
Joined: June 2nd, 2012, 10:05 pm
Location: Texas, USA
Contact: Yahoo Messenger, AOL
Your camo pattern on the Quinn Bay Class CVE looks awesome.

And your submarine doesn't look too bad to me. LOL, a lot of early submarines from that period did look like "glorified cigar tubes", so you're design is not too far off the mark. The only thing I might say is most subs had smaller conning towers back then, and 6 bow torpedo tubes might be a little bit too optimistic. Most subs back then had no more than 4 bow tubes, but 6 is not impossible. Other than that, the hull shape and features looks pretty spot on for the period to me.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor DesignsPosted: July 2nd, 2012, 6:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
That cammo pattern should dazzle any sub captain,it sure dazzled me. :lol:


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Grays Harbor DesignsPosted: July 2nd, 2012, 8:14 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
travestytrav25 wrote:
Your camo pattern on the Quinn Bay Class CVE looks awesome.

And your submarine doesn't look too bad to me. LOL, a lot of early submarines from that period did look like "glorified cigar tubes", so you're design is not too far off the mark. The only thing I might say is most subs had smaller conning towers back then, and 6 bow torpedo tubes might be a little bit too optimistic. Most subs back then had no more than 4 bow tubes, but 6 is not impossible. Other than that, the hull shape and features looks pretty spot on for the period to me.
Its actually based on the British L Class, Group 3, which had the large con and 6 x 21" bow tubes. Its just that mine looks, well, bare ... to me, and I'm not sure how to proceed. I don't want to over-shade it, that would look silly, but just having a single line doesn't quite cut it either. I probably ought add some sort of deck gun, I'm sure of that at least.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 86 of 137  [ 1362 posts ]  Return to “Personal Designs” | Go to page « 184 85 86 87 88137 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]