Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 26 of 35  [ 347 posts ]  Go to page « 124 25 26 27 2835 »
Author Message
nighthunter
Post subject: Re: Renewing the old parts sheetsPosted: June 22nd, 2012, 4:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
Colo, would you mind posting them? The only ones I can find are the old ones. As for the 2 line barrel, the 57mm gun has a single line barrel.

_________________
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: Renewing the old parts sheetsPosted: June 22nd, 2012, 4:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
[ img ]

That's the twin Bofors. This is similarly scaled to the quad mount, and taken directly from a Friedman's drawing in US Cruisers (scaled appropriately, of course). In my mind it is perfectly adequate to represent the system and does not need reworking; if you guys want to do that, knock yourselves out, but I will not be replacing anything on my ships. I know what I'm doing. ;)

The quad mount is somewhere in the USN Systems thread, even though the OP hasn't been updated in literally years it seems. Tim is too busy watching children's cartoons to get work done on it. :P

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
nighthunter
Post subject: Re: Renewing the old parts sheetsPosted: June 22nd, 2012, 5:07 pm
Offline
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
I'm more confused about the scale difference between the 40mm & the 57mm guns

_________________
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Renewing the old parts sheetsPosted: June 22nd, 2012, 5:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Colosseum wrote:
The quad mount is somewhere in the USN Systems thread, even though the OP hasn't been updated in literally years it seems. Tim is too busy watching children's cartoons to get work done on it. :P
Big problem right now is that I do need to redraw the entire sheet - and I am working on it. ETA is sometime after my name gets added to the staff list on the main site and/or my Sennheisers get back from service. :P

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Renewing the old parts sheetsPosted: June 22nd, 2012, 5:24 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
the twin 40mm colo showed is good. its as ive understood in rigth scale. Problem comes that despite it should show the largest mount for the gun, most of the single barrel versions used in the bucket are considerably larger ;)

Also, the watercooled 40mm's should have two-pixel thick barrels as presented.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Renewing the old parts sheetsPosted: June 22nd, 2012, 5:36 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
nighthunter wrote:
I'm more confused about the scale difference between the 40mm & the 57mm guns
That's because some variants of the 40mm had a rather large water cooling shroud around them. The air-cooled 40mm guns are drawn with one pixel wide barrels.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
nighthunter
Post subject: Re: Renewing the old parts sheetsPosted: June 22nd, 2012, 6:23 pm
Offline
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
Well, what was commonly used on US vessels? Water-cooled or air? And thanks for explaining it everyone!

_________________
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: Renewing the old parts sheetsPosted: June 22nd, 2012, 6:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
The USN used water cooled primarily.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Renewing the old parts sheetsPosted: June 22nd, 2012, 7:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
The twin mounts were almost allways watercooled (Colo's drawing for example). Only some models sold pre-WWII to navies of Poland and Yugoslavia for examble had air-cooled twin mounts on. In otherhand, single mounts with watercooled barrels also existed but not so commonly, and most of the variety of all 40mm L-60 model single mounts were aircooled.
I think all L-70 models that were made postwar were air cooled.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
nighthunter
Post subject: Re: Renewing the old parts sheetsPosted: June 22nd, 2012, 8:21 pm
Offline
Posts: 1971
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:33 pm
Thank you for educating me, Golly, I appreciate it.

_________________
"It is better to type nothing and be assumed an ass, than to type something and remove all doubt." - Me


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 26 of 35  [ 347 posts ]  Return to “Official Parts Sheets” | Go to page « 124 25 26 27 2835 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]