Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 17 of 18  [ 173 posts ]  Go to page « 114 15 16 17 18 »
Author Message
ezgo394
Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas)Posted: November 7th, 2010, 11:12 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1332
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:39 am
Location: Cappach, Salide
I made a new map of IoT, but it will be a while before I post it. It looks a lot more realistic, and it will now be located in the Indian Ocean.

The population is 1.325 Million.

Here is my new navy list.
8 Challenger Frigate/Destroyer
2 Challenger Flight Deck/Heli Carrier
4 Minehunters
10 Patrol Boats
2 New Stealth Subs
12 Deltic Submarines
2 Replensishment ships

Please Comment.

_________________
Salide - Denton - The Interrealms

I am not very active on the forums anymore, but work is still being done on my AUs. Visit the Salidan Altiverse Page on the SB Wiki for more information. All current work is being done on Google Docs.
If anyone wishes for their nations to interact with the countries of the Salidan Altiverse, please send me a PM, after which we can further discuss through email.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ezgo394
Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas)Posted: November 10th, 2010, 10:57 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1332
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:39 am
Location: Cappach, Salide
Still WIPs but this is what I have.
[ img ]
In order of appearance:
8 Challenger Class Frigate/Destroyers
2 Challenger Flight Deck/Helicarrier
4 Minehunter
10 Patrol Boats
[ img ]
2 Shadow Class Stealth subs
10 Texas Class Subs
2 Seeker Class Subs

_________________
Salide - Denton - The Interrealms

I am not very active on the forums anymore, but work is still being done on my AUs. Visit the Salidan Altiverse Page on the SB Wiki for more information. All current work is being done on Google Docs.
If anyone wishes for their nations to interact with the countries of the Salidan Altiverse, please send me a PM, after which we can further discuss through email.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas)Posted: November 11th, 2010, 5:11 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
"Stealth Sub" is rather redundant.

Also that's a rather small hull to be supporting CH-47. That thing eats up deck space.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ezgo394
Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas)Posted: November 12th, 2010, 12:23 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1332
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:39 am
Location: Cappach, Salide
Well, I mean stealthier than the Texas.

Would you recommend the CH-46 Sea Knight.

Also, would this concept work?
Don't immediately shoot it down because it's never been done before or that it looks weird. I just want to know that its possible and has just as much advantage as the conventional setup.
[ img ]

_________________
Salide - Denton - The Interrealms

I am not very active on the forums anymore, but work is still being done on my AUs. Visit the Salidan Altiverse Page on the SB Wiki for more information. All current work is being done on Google Docs.
If anyone wishes for their nations to interact with the countries of the Salidan Altiverse, please send me a PM, after which we can further discuss through email.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas)Posted: November 14th, 2010, 9:47 am
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Erm, I take it this is a bow propeller and rudder and not just a shipbucket stern turned the other way with the bows cut off?

No, can't see this working, propellers are designed for maximum effiency to push the water behind them to create thrust. Here the hull behind the propeller blocks most of this thrust as the water now finds itself stuck and has to move past the hull aft thus losing speed and thrust.
Rudders need a slipstream of water passing them to be effective, that is why they are behind the propllers so they are more effective. Bow rudders were tried on several early destroyers at the turn of the last Century to aid manoeurving in confined places and at low forward speeds but they often weren't much use. Also your bows will be much thicker than an ordinary bow thus losing more speed and needing more propulsive power to acheive the same speed as a normal ship. Saying that have a finer stern might improve the waterflow over the hull but by losing propulsive efficency you're gaining much.

There have been some double-ended ferries etc with propellers bow and stern (or even better with a Voith-Schneider propeller) for routine rapid turn-around times but really you can't argue against 200 years (rudders aft for 1,000 years) of tried and tested. Your idea has no real benefits at all. Ships are designed for optimum effiency. Just sticking the stern at the front is not a Eureka moment, nor is it a serious "concept" at all.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ezgo394
Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas)Posted: November 14th, 2010, 6:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1332
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:39 am
Location: Cappach, Salide
Ok. I figured that. Thank you for clarifying that.

_________________
Salide - Denton - The Interrealms

I am not very active on the forums anymore, but work is still being done on my AUs. Visit the Salidan Altiverse Page on the SB Wiki for more information. All current work is being done on Google Docs.
If anyone wishes for their nations to interact with the countries of the Salidan Altiverse, please send me a PM, after which we can further discuss through email.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas)Posted: November 14th, 2010, 6:17 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
It would be a very good configuration for ice breaking (see Double-Acting ships and some icebreakers) but as for raw efficiency for moving forward on the ocean, it's not very good.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas)Posted: January 3rd, 2011, 2:56 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Novice wrote:
ezgo394 wrote:
Would it make sense to have a Miesweeper that is also a minelayer?
In the past many mineseepers had also the ability to lay mines. HMS Abdiel (1973) was in fact a training minelayer, used to train minesweepers , and so was used to lay mines.
I believe the RDN also used its sweepers to lay mines.
We did (all the minelaying gear was decommissioned a couple of years ago) but only because we cheat.
The SF300 itself isn't capable of clearing mines. While it's constructed from GRP, it still have a way too powerful magnetic field. What it can do is control two drones of either the MSD, MSF or Holm classes, making it the worlds smallest mothership.
Since the drones are smaller and don't have to support enough weapons to arm a corvette or small frigate, it's fairly straigt forward to demagnetize them and make them ultra quiet. That said, the first series of SF300 (There's three) had a hydraulic drive for silent running.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ezgo394
Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas)Posted: January 18th, 2011, 2:16 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1332
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:39 am
Location: Cappach, Salide
[ img ]
[ img ]

_________________
Salide - Denton - The Interrealms

I am not very active on the forums anymore, but work is still being done on my AUs. Visit the Salidan Altiverse Page on the SB Wiki for more information. All current work is being done on Google Docs.
If anyone wishes for their nations to interact with the countries of the Salidan Altiverse, please send me a PM, after which we can further discuss through email.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Demon Lord Razgriz
Post subject: Re: IoT (Isle of Texas)Posted: January 18th, 2011, 7:01 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 446
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 1:18 am
Location: Eastern North Carolina
JPEG fail on the screws! DK

_________________
95% of my drawings are destined for NS, 4.9% for fun, & .1% serious.
Worklist:
Space Shuttle
Atlas V
Delta II/III
Project Constellation
Soyuz series


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 17 of 18  [ 173 posts ]  Return to “Beginners Only” | Go to page « 114 15 16 17 18 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]