Shipbucket

I apologize if I wasn't clear. I assume you're using the picture of Lion that started from Breyer's book, that shows the front of the turret with a slope to it. For all that his book was incredibly valuable (and still is, in parts), it does have several errors, especially amongst the designs not actually built. One of them is his picture of the G3 battlecruiser with an external belt, for instance. The 14" gun turrets on the King George V class would be the model for the Lion's turrets, and that involves:
1. No blast bags/bloomers on the gun ports.
2. A completely flat front, with no tilt/inclination. The RN had moved away from this in their battleship designs and it was not to make a re-appearance.
3. There would likely be a 'step' with the bottom of the turret faceplate set back from the barbette. While this was not present on KGV's two-gun turret, it was on the four-gun turrets, and would almost certainly be present to a lesser extent.
4. The sides would be relatively featureless, a rangefinder, perhaps a ladder, and little else.
5. The rear of the turret also does not match that of the World War Two Royal Navy designs.
6. The front half to two-thirds of the roof would slope down slightly to meet the top of the faceplate, not be completely flat.
7. The sides of British heavy gun turrets of this design generation were slightly sloped, and had at least one 'break' where there was a visible vertical angle in the metal.

While what was on the sheet is incorrect in scale, it, while simplistic, is much closer to what the turrets would have looked like.
What you have right now looks very good for an American battleship turret, but it is not what the 16"/45 three-gun turrets on Lion would have looked like.

My limited understanding concurs with this fellow. Be nice to the new guy, everyone.

High praise that.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

No, the turret posted by MitchelLL30 is based on my Wesworld AU 16in turret, Not at all a real-world weapon.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft

I also said, the size of the thing is only correct.
Read my previous post.

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331

Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier

Thanks Hood, not least for updating all this stuff; it inspires me to get cracking again on 'old grey funnel line'.

is there a sheet with RN missiles as well?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Nein

No,
There are few British missiles of note and all can be found on the missiles sheets. Saying that the launchers do need work and this will be done at some point.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft

Are there somewhere drawings of early 18-inch torpedo tubes?

_________________
Worklist: Portuguese Navy and Barnegat class seaplane tenders