Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 5 of 7  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page « 13 4 5 6 7 »

Best single propeller engined fighter
1. North American P-51H  31%  [ 16 ]
2. Vought F4U-5  10%  [ 5 ]
3. Focke Wulf Fw-190D-9/Ta.152  17%  [ 9 ]
4. CAC Kangaroo  6%  [ 3 ]
5. Hawker Sea Fury  12%  [ 6 ]
6. Grumman F8F Bearcat  6%  [ 3 ]
7.Lavochkin La-9/ La-11  0%  [ 0 ]
8. Supermarine Spiteful/Seafang  6%  [ 3 ]
9. P-47N/XP-72/XP-47J  6%  [ 3 ]
10. Ki-84  8%  [ 4 ]
Total votes: 52
Author Message
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Best Single Engined Prop Fighter From 1945 or LaterPosted: May 31st, 2012, 7:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Hurricane, Spitfire and Bf-109 are the iconic figthers that I grew up to love when WWII (outside of our part and history) was more of a fascinating epic story than a reall historical event. Naturally the Bf-109 ("mersu" as our airforces called it, sharing the nick name of mercedes-benz cars and all what assosiates to them) Is sort of closest to my heart and comes up to my mind first when I have to think about that era and air forces. Bwester Buffalo is other, and its amazing how that little thing has almost mythical super-figther status in finnish war history, and when you go out to the english language world, people helds it as a carbage...

I think this poll should be more of "favorite" since "best" should be something that the mathematical atributes and performance of thing should determ, not subjective opinions?

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Zephyr
Post subject: Re: Best Single Engined Prop Fighter From 1945 or LaterPosted: May 31st, 2012, 7:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1587
Joined: November 22nd, 2011, 4:47 am
Location: Marietta, Georgia - USA
The Buffalo, I believe, got the "garbage" image because it was used in limited numbers, outnumbered and outclassed by Japanese aircraft of the period, and the pilots who flew it had been accustomed to nimble little biplane fighters.. In the hands of Finnish pilots though, they used it skillfully and to great effect. Even though still outnumbered by the USSR aircraft, they managed to work with the Buffaloes advantages rather than its faults, if that makes any sense. The Finns took a marginal aircraft and turned it into something greater through skill and daring. I have always loved the Buffalo.

_________________
"Anybody remotely interesting is mad in some way." - The Seventh Doctor


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Kilomuse
Post subject: Re: Best Single Engined Prop Fighter From 1945 or LaterPosted: May 31st, 2012, 10:05 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 487
Joined: August 6th, 2010, 4:07 am
Location: California
The Mustang is the closest to my heart after sitting in one as a kid, hearing the glorious Merlin running, and watching it beat up the airfield and talking to the pilot. As a 6 year old kid with a thing for airplanes, there's no greater thing on earth! But if I were building an air force in 1945 and had to choose a prop plane, I'd go with the F4U any day of the week. It's performance in WWII and Korea is nothing short of legendary IMO.

_________________
Republic of Lisenia AU - In progress
Republic of Lisenia in FD Scale - In progress


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Trojan
Post subject: Re: Best Single Engined Prop Fighter From 1945 or LaterPosted: May 31st, 2012, 11:25 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House
Ok while I will make a favorite WW2 fighter poll (why not)
The point of this poll was more to see what the opinion of what was the best of the best in terms of the Ultimate best all around piston engined fighter sorry if that wasn't made clear
my personal WW2 favorite has to be the Wildcat
the F4F was quiet the plane and I think the Buffalo was known to be underpowered and outdated compared to a Zero but man those Finnish pilots could just go to town with them

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Best Single Engined Prop Fighter From 1945 or LaterPosted: June 1st, 2012, 12:24 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
Both the P-40 Warhawk and the F4F Wildcat did pretty good against superior enemies. As long as you use them the right way anything can be quite deadly. Remember, it was the weak Sherman that killed the mighty King Tiger.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Best Single Engined Prop Fighter From 1945 or LaterPosted: June 1st, 2012, 6:46 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Karle94 wrote:
Remember, it was the weak Sherman that killed the mighty King Tiger.
With what ? died laughing ? :lol:
Zephyr wrote:
The Buffalo, I believe, got the "garbage" image because it was used in limited numbers, outnumbered and outclassed by Japanese aircraft of the period, and the pilots who flew it had been accustomed to nimble little biplane fighters.. In the hands of Finnish pilots though, they used it skillfully and to great effect. Even though still outnumbered by the USSR aircraft, they managed to work with the Buffaloes advantages rather than its faults, if that makes any sense. The Finns took a marginal aircraft and turned it into something greater through skill and daring. I have always loved the Buffalo.
F2A was a good fighter, in good hands. Early in to war he was still moder but like all US planes he was outclassed by Japs fighters in terms of maneuverability. Fins show us how you can fly a fighter ... but they was flaying against soviets, it is like shooting to fish in the barrel.

I always like early Fiat Falco, Italians know how to build fighters, in the end they design Macchi C.202 and 205. Small in numbers but just awesome planes.

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ezgo394
Post subject: Re: Best Single Engined Prop Fighter From 1945 or LaterPosted: June 1st, 2012, 7:06 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1332
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 2:39 am
Location: Cappach, Salide
Rhade wrote:
Karle94 wrote:
Remember, it was the weak Sherman that killed the mighty King Tiger.
With what ? died laughing ? :lol:
Haven't you ever seen Kelly's Heroes, with Clint Eastwood, and Donald Sutherland?
Kelly's talking to Oddball, and asking about the Tiger tanks, to which Oddball replies, "The only way to take a Tiger out, is by shooting it in the ass."
:lol:

_________________
Salide - Denton - The Interrealms

I am not very active on the forums anymore, but work is still being done on my AUs. Visit the Salidan Altiverse Page on the SB Wiki for more information. All current work is being done on Google Docs.
If anyone wishes for their nations to interact with the countries of the Salidan Altiverse, please send me a PM, after which we can further discuss through email.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Best Single Engined Prop Fighter From 1945 or LaterPosted: June 1st, 2012, 8:16 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
Thats not fair man ... you don't shoot somebody in the ass! It's no polite! :lol:

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: Best Single Engined Prop Fighter From 1945 or LaterPosted: June 1st, 2012, 11:32 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2129
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
Let me see, four and a half thousand Tiger Is, 500-1000 Tiger IIs against 50,000 Sherman tanks. That is how they won, sheer numbers.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Rhade
Post subject: Re: Best Single Engined Prop Fighter From 1945 or LaterPosted: June 1st, 2012, 12:06 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2804
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 12:45 pm
Location: Poland
They build only 492 Königstigers and 1,347 Tigers.

_________________
[ img ]
Nobody expects the Imperial Inquisition!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 5 of 7  [ 64 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page « 13 4 5 6 7 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]