Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 4  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »

If you could choose one modern attack helicopter for what would it be
Boeing Apache  48%  [ 19 ]
Eurocopter Tiger  8%  [ 3 ]
Bell AH-1Z  8%  [ 3 ]
Denel AH-2 Rooivalk  3%  [ 1 ]
Augusta Westland Mangusta  0%  [ 0 ]
Mill Mi-28  3%  [ 1 ]
Kamov KA-50/Ka-52  15%  [ 6 ]
Upgraded Mil Mi-24  10%  [ 4 ]
Other  8%  [ 3 ]
Total votes: 40
Author Message
Trojan
Post subject: Re: best helicopterPosted: May 6th, 2012, 10:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1216
Joined: March 26th, 2012, 4:29 am
Location: Big House
yes gordo I saw that too supposedly it can carry it
Personally I'm a big fan of the AH-1Z (the AH-1W has Hellfire capability btw but i may have misunderstood if u said it did or not blackbuck) and a westernized KA-52 i think would be simply awesome sad that the IAI version the Erdogan didn't win the Turkish competition nor the AH-1Z
hmm interesting with the WZ-10 option though

_________________
Projects:
Zealandia AU
John Company AU
References and feedback is always welcome!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: best helicopterPosted: May 7th, 2012, 12:48 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
It does not have it integrated into it, it can however be retrofitted with a podded version of longbow on one of the hardpoints which isn't really optimal considering.

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
gordo8000
Post subject: Re: best helicopterPosted: May 7th, 2012, 5:41 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 511
Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
I don't get that, why they didn't have Longbow integrated into the design from the beginning?

_________________
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: best helicopterPosted: May 7th, 2012, 5:49 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
The Longbow radar weren't around when they designed the AH-1 and retro fitting it would require a major redesign of the rotor assembly.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
gordo8000
Post subject: Re: best helicopterPosted: May 7th, 2012, 7:00 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 511
Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:18 am
Location: Chillin with my wolf pack in Siberia.
Well, they already redesigned the rotor when they built the AH-1Z, so why didn't they integrate it then?

_________________
Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish on its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. - Albert Einstein
The only stupid questions are the ones that go unasked.
Korean AU


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: best helicopterPosted: May 7th, 2012, 7:08 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
They didn't see a need for it.
The longbow is great for stopping the Red Horde(c), less so when fighting fourth and fifth rate militaries and insurgents. Guess what the US has been fighting since 1950.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: best helicopterPosted: May 7th, 2012, 9:18 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Thiel wrote:
The Longbow radar weren't around when they designed the AH-1 and retro fitting it would require a major redesign of the rotor assembly.
Thiel wrote:
They didn't see a need for it.
The longbow is great for stopping the Red Horde(c), less so when fighting fourth and fifth rate militaries and insurgents. Guess what the US has been fighting since 1950.
You're totally ignoring the fact that you can do GMTI and SAR mapping with Longbow which is useful no no matter what sort of conflict you're in, considering that I would replace the rotor assembly with new blades re-designing the rotor-head to accommodate a radome wouldn't be out of the ream of sensibility would it?

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: best helicopterPosted: May 7th, 2012, 9:38 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
I'm not ignoring it, but the USMC obviously didn't find the capabilities important enough to justify the cost and maintenance issues and the reduction in payload/range/speed it would bring with it.
It should also be noted that IR sensors are far more useful for most SAR jobs.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
odysseus1980
Post subject: Re: best helicopterPosted: May 7th, 2012, 10:00 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3607
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 8:53 am
Location: Athens,Hellenic Kingdom
Contact: Website
Although my country uses the Boeing Apache (which is among the best attack helicopters),I am fan of Russian designs such as Mil Mi-24/Mi-35 and Ka-50/Ka-52.
Note that I have seen in action the Mi-35 during an exercise when doing my duty in Cyrpus.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Blackbuck
Post subject: Re: best helicopterPosted: May 7th, 2012, 11:00 am
Offline
Posts: 2743
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 9:15 am
Location: Birmingham, United Kingdom
Thiel wrote:
I'm not ignoring it, but the USMC obviously didn't find the capabilities important enough to justify the cost and maintenance issues and the reduction in payload/range/speed it would bring with it.
It should also be noted that IR sensors are far more useful for most SAR jobs.
You can do synthetic aperture mapping with an IR camera? That's news to me...

_________________
AU Projects: | Banbha et al. | New England: The Divided States
Blood and Fire


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 4  [ 33 posts ]  Return to “Off Topic” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]